INTRODUCTION: Younger breast cancer survivors often lead extremely busy lives with multiple demands and responsibilities, making them difficult to recruit into clinical trials. African American women are even more difficult to recruit because of additional historical and cultural barriers. In a randomized clinical trial of an intervention, we successfully used culturally informed, population-specific recruitment and retention strategies to engage younger African-American breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Caucasian and African American breast cancer survivors were recruited from multiple communities and sites. A variety of planned recruitment and retention strategies addressed cultural and population-specific barriers and were guided by three key principals: increasing familiarity with the study in the communities of interest; increasing the availability and accessibility of study information and study participation; and using cultural brokers. RESULTS: Accrual of younger African-American breast cancer survivors increased by 373% in 11 months. The steepest rise in the numbers of African-American women recruited came when all strategies were in place and operating simultaneously. Retention rates were 87% for both Caucasian and African American women. DISCUSSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: To successfully recruit busy, younger African American cancer survivors, it is important to use a multifaceted approach, addressing cultural and racial/ethnic barriers to research participation; bridging gaps across cultures and communities; including the role of faith and beliefs in considering research participation; recognizing the demands of different life stages and economic situations and the place of research in the larger picture of peoples' lives. Designs for recruitment and retention need to be broadly conceptualized and specifically applied. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: For busy cancer survivors, willingness to participate in and complete research participation is enhanced by strategies that address barriers but also acknowledge the many demands on their time by making research familiar, available, accessible and credible.
INTRODUCTION: Younger breast cancer survivors often lead extremely busy lives with multiple demands and responsibilities, making them difficult to recruit into clinical trials. African American women are even more difficult to recruit because of additional historical and cultural barriers. In a randomized clinical trial of an intervention, we successfully used culturally informed, population-specific recruitment and retention strategies to engage younger African-American breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Caucasian and African American breast cancer survivors were recruited from multiple communities and sites. A variety of planned recruitment and retention strategies addressed cultural and population-specific barriers and were guided by three key principals: increasing familiarity with the study in the communities of interest; increasing the availability and accessibility of study information and study participation; and using cultural brokers. RESULTS: Accrual of younger African-American breast cancer survivors increased by 373% in 11 months. The steepest rise in the numbers of African-American women recruited came when all strategies were in place and operating simultaneously. Retention rates were 87% for both Caucasian and African American women. DISCUSSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: To successfully recruit busy, younger African American cancer survivors, it is important to use a multifaceted approach, addressing cultural and racial/ethnic barriers to research participation; bridging gaps across cultures and communities; including the role of faith and beliefs in considering research participation; recognizing the demands of different life stages and economic situations and the place of research in the larger picture of peoples' lives. Designs for recruitment and retention need to be broadly conceptualized and specifically applied. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: For busy cancer survivors, willingness to participate in and complete research participation is enhanced by strategies that address barriers but also acknowledge the many demands on their time by making research familiar, available, accessible and credible.
Authors: Soumya J Niranjan; Raegan W Durant; Jennifer A Wenzel; Elise D Cook; Mona N Fouad; Selwyn M Vickers; Badrinath R Konety; Sarah B Rutland; Zachary R Simoni; Michelle Y Martin Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Melissa A Green; Margo Michaels; Natasha Blakeney; Adebowale A Odulana; Malika Roman Isler; Alan Richmond; Debra G Long; William S Robinson; Yhenneko J Taylor; Giselle Corbie-Smith Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Michael P Arnold; Michele Andrasik; Stewart Landers; Shelly Karuna; Matthew J Mimiaga; Steven Wakefield; Kenneth Mayer; Susan Buchbinder; Beryl A Koblin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Melissa A Green; Mimi M Kim; Sharrelle Barber; Abedowale A Odulana; Paul A Godley; Daniel L Howard; Giselle M Corbie-Smith Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Andrea M Barsevick; Amy Leader; Patricia K Bradley; Tiffany Avery; Lorraine T Dean; Melissa DiCarlo; Sarah E Hegarty Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Nora L Nock; Cynthia Owusu; Susan Flocke; Susan A Krejci; Emily L Kullman; Kris Austin; Beth Bennett; Stephen Cerne; Carl Harmon; Halle Moore; Mary Vargo; Paul Hergenroeder; Hermione Malone; Michael Rocco; Russell Tracy; Hillard M Lazarus; John P Kirwan; Ellen Heyman; Nathan A Berger Journal: Int J Sports Exerc Med Date: 2015-09-05