Nicole Ennis Whitehead1, Lauren E Hearn. 1. Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poorer health outcomes and lower survival rates have been well documented among African American/Black (Black) women diagnosed with breast cancer. Black women are 41% more likely to die from breast cancer than White women despite a lower incidence rate. Apart from pharmacotherapy, psychosocial interventions are recommended by the Institute of Medicine as standard medical care for breast cancer patients at all phases of treatment. The current review is the first attempt to systematically evaluate the literature on the influence of psychosocial interventions for Black women diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: This systematic review aimed to adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A comprehensive computerized literature search of CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science was conducted to obtain relevant studies. RESULTS: Interventions demonstrated improved mood, decreased distress, increased ability to cope with intrusive thoughts and cancer-related stress, personal growth, and improved social well-being. However, aspects unique to this population require additional scientific inquiry. Over 80% of empirical interventions focused on Black women diagnosed with breast cancer have been concentrated on the posttreatment phase. There is a paucity of work at the time of diagnosis and during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: To address gaps in the scientific literature, more work is needed to better understand how psychosocial interventions can improve the health trajectory for Black women diagnosed with breast cancer particularly in the areas of seeking help and support, identifying culturally acceptable methods for engaging support networks, and identifying best practices for enhancing coping skills.
BACKGROUND: Poorer health outcomes and lower survival rates have been well documented among African American/Black (Black) women diagnosed with breast cancer. Black women are 41% more likely to die from breast cancer than White women despite a lower incidence rate. Apart from pharmacotherapy, psychosocial interventions are recommended by the Institute of Medicine as standard medical care for breast cancerpatients at all phases of treatment. The current review is the first attempt to systematically evaluate the literature on the influence of psychosocial interventions for Black women diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: This systematic review aimed to adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A comprehensive computerized literature search of CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science was conducted to obtain relevant studies. RESULTS: Interventions demonstrated improved mood, decreased distress, increased ability to cope with intrusive thoughts and cancer-related stress, personal growth, and improved social well-being. However, aspects unique to this population require additional scientific inquiry. Over 80% of empirical interventions focused on Black women diagnosed with breast cancer have been concentrated on the posttreatment phase. There is a paucity of work at the time of diagnosis and during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: To address gaps in the scientific literature, more work is needed to better understand how psychosocial interventions can improve the health trajectory for Black women diagnosed with breast cancer particularly in the areas of seeking help and support, identifying culturally acceptable methods for engaging support networks, and identifying best practices for enhancing coping skills.
Authors: Leslie R Schover; Michelle M Rhodes; George Baum; Jennifer Harned Adams; Rosell Jenkins; Pamela Lewis; Karen Eubanks Jackson Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Alyson B Moadel; Chirag Shah; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Melanie S Harris; Sapana R Patel; Charles B Hall; Joseph A Sparano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vanessa B Sheppard; Sherrie F Wallington; Shawna C Willey; Regina M Hampton; W Lucas; Y Jennings; S Horton; N Muzeck; C Cocilovo; C Isaacs Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Allyson D Diggins; Lauren E Hearn; Suzanne C Lechner; Debra Annane; Michael H Antoni; Nicole Ennis Whitehead Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-02-28 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Aria M Miller; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Naomi N Modeste; R Patti Herring; Diadrey-Anne T Sealy Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-01-10 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Jennifer C Plumb Vilardaga; Hannah M Fisher; Joseph G Winger; Shannon N Miller; Christine Nuñez; Catherine Majestic; Sarah A Kelleher; Tamara J Somers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Cleo A Samuel; Laura C Pinheiro; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Jennifer S Walker; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Shekinah A Fashaw; Cheryl Woods-Giscombe; Stephanie B Wheeler Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 4.872