INTRODUCTION: Prevention and treatment standards are based on evidence obtained in behavioral and clinical research. However, racial and ethnic minorities remain relatively absent from the science that develops these standards. While investigators have successfully recruited participants for individual studies using tailored recruitment methods, these strategies require considerable time and resources. Research registries, typically developed around a disease or condition, serve as a promising model for a targeted recruitment method to increase minority participation in health research. This study assessed the tailored recruitment methods used to populate a health research registry targeting African-American community members. METHODS: We describe six recruitment methods applied between September 2004 and October 2008 to recruit members into a health research registry. Recruitment included direct (existing studies, public databases, community outreach) and indirect methods (radio, internet, and email) targeting the general population, local universities, and African American communities. We conducted retrospective analysis of the recruitment by method using descriptive statistics, frequencies, and chi-square statistics. RESULTS: During the recruitment period, 608 individuals enrolled in the research registry. The majority of enrollees were African American, female, and in good health. Direct and indirect methods were identified as successful strategies for subgroups. Findings suggest significant associations between recruitment methods and age, presence of existing health condition, prior research participation, and motivation to join the registry. CONCLUSIONS: A health research registry can be a successful tool to increase minority awareness of research opportunities. Multi-pronged recruitment approaches are needed to reach diverse subpopulations.
INTRODUCTION: Prevention and treatment standards are based on evidence obtained in behavioral and clinical research. However, racial and ethnic minorities remain relatively absent from the science that develops these standards. While investigators have successfully recruited participants for individual studies using tailored recruitment methods, these strategies require considerable time and resources. Research registries, typically developed around a disease or condition, serve as a promising model for a targeted recruitment method to increase minority participation in health research. This study assessed the tailored recruitment methods used to populate a health research registry targeting African-American community members. METHODS: We describe six recruitment methods applied between September 2004 and October 2008 to recruit members into a health research registry. Recruitment included direct (existing studies, public databases, community outreach) and indirect methods (radio, internet, and email) targeting the general population, local universities, and African American communities. We conducted retrospective analysis of the recruitment by method using descriptive statistics, frequencies, and chi-square statistics. RESULTS: During the recruitment period, 608 individuals enrolled in the research registry. The majority of enrollees were African American, female, and in good health. Direct and indirect methods were identified as successful strategies for subgroups. Findings suggest significant associations between recruitment methods and age, presence of existing health condition, prior research participation, and motivation to join the registry. CONCLUSIONS: A health research registry can be a successful tool to increase minority awareness of research opportunities. Multi-pronged recruitment approaches are needed to reach diverse subpopulations.
Authors: Mona N Fouad; Edward Partridge; Mark Dignan; Cheryl Holt; Rhoda Johnson; Chris Nagy; Sharina Person; Theresa Wynn; Isabel Scarinci Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sandra Crouse Quinn; James Butler; Craig S Fryer; Mary A Garza; Kevin H Kim; Christopher Ryan; Stephen B Thomas Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Joel B Braunstein; Noëlle S Sherber; Steven P Schulman; Eric L Ding; Neil R Powe Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Djenaba A Joseph; Phyllis A Wingo; Jessica B King; Lori A Pollack; Lisa C Richardson; Xiaocheng Wu; Vivien Chen; Harland D Austin; Deirdre Rogers; Janice Cook Journal: Prehosp Disaster Med Date: 2007 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.040
Authors: Ibrahima C Sankaré; Rachelle Bross; Arleen F Brown; Homero E Del Pino; Loretta F Jones; D'Ann M Morris; Courtney Porter; Aziza Lucas-Wright; Roberto Vargas; Nell Forge; Keith C Norris; Katherine L Kahn Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2015-06-21 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Alicia K Gerke; Fan Tang; Yvette C Cozier; Michael T Lash; James Schappet; Emily Phillips; Philip M Polgreen Journal: Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 0.670
Authors: LaToya N Hall; Lisa J Ficker; Letha A Chadiha; Carmen R Green; James S Jackson; Peter A Lichtenberg Journal: Gerontol Geriatr Med Date: 2016-11-16
Authors: Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan; Verity A Leach; John D McGeagh; Ruta Margelyte; Niamh M Redmond; Axel Walther; Sabi Redwood Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2017-06-21