Andrea M Barsevick1, Amy Leader2, Patricia K Bradley3, Tiffany Avery4, Lorraine T Dean5, Melissa DiCarlo2, Sarah E Hegarty2. 1. Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. Andrea.barsevick@jefferson.edu. 2. Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. 3. Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA. 4. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 5. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: African American breast cancer survivors (AABCS) have a lower survival rate across all disease stages (79 %) compared with White survivors (92 %) and often have more aggressive forms of breast cancer requiring multimodality treatment, so they could experience a larger burden of post-treatment quality of life (QOL) problems. This paper reports a comprehensive assessment of the number, severity, and domains of problems faced by AABCS within 5 years after treatment completion and identifies subgroups at risk for these problems. METHODS: A population-based random sample was obtained from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry of African American females over 18 years of age who completed primary treatment for breast cancer in the past 5 years. A mailed survey was used to document survivorship problems. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-seven AABCS completed the survey. The median number of survivor problems reported was 15. Exploratory factor analysis of the problem scale revealed four domains: emotional problems, physical problems, lack of resources, and sexuality problems. Across problem domains, younger age, more comorbid conditions, and greater medical mistrust were risk factors for more severe problems. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that AABCS experienced significant problem burden in the early years after diagnosis and treatment. In addition to emotional and physical problem domains that were documented in previous research, two problem domains unique to AABCS included lack of resources and sexuality concerns. At risk groups should be targeted for intervention. The study results reported in this manuscript will inform future research to address problems of AABCS as they make the transition from cancer patient to cancer survivor.
PURPOSE: African American breast cancer survivors (AABCS) have a lower survival rate across all disease stages (79 %) compared with White survivors (92 %) and often have more aggressive forms of breast cancer requiring multimodality treatment, so they could experience a larger burden of post-treatment quality of life (QOL) problems. This paper reports a comprehensive assessment of the number, severity, and domains of problems faced by AABCS within 5 years after treatment completion and identifies subgroups at risk for these problems. METHODS: A population-based random sample was obtained from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry of African American females over 18 years of age who completed primary treatment for breast cancer in the past 5 years. A mailed survey was used to document survivorship problems. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-seven AABCS completed the survey. The median number of survivor problems reported was 15. Exploratory factor analysis of the problem scale revealed four domains: emotional problems, physical problems, lack of resources, and sexuality problems. Across problem domains, younger age, more comorbid conditions, and greater medical mistrust were risk factors for more severe problems. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that AABCS experienced significant problem burden in the early years after diagnosis and treatment. In addition to emotional and physical problem domains that were documented in previous research, two problem domains unique to AABCS included lack of resources and sexuality concerns. At risk groups should be targeted for intervention. The study results reported in this manuscript will inform future research to address problems of AABCS as they make the transition from cancerpatient to cancer survivor.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American; Breast cancer; Cancer survivor; Disparities; Medical mistrust; Quality of life
Authors: Kathryn H Schmitz; Marian L Neuhouser; Tanya Agurs-Collins; Krista A Zanetti; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Lorraine T Dean; Bettina F Drake Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ruth E Patterson; Nazmus Saquib; Loki Natarajan; Cheryl L Rock; Barbara A Parker; Cynthia A Thomson; John P Pierce Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kathleen M Russell; Diane M Von Ah; R Brian Giesler; Anna M Storniolo; Joan E Haase Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Ruth E Patterson; Shirley W Flatt; Nazmus Saquib; Cheryl L Rock; Bette J Caan; Barbara A Parker; Gail A Laughlin; Kirsten Erickson; Cynthia A Thomson; Wayne A Bardwell; Richard A Hajek; John P Pierce Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Marium Husain; Timiya S Nolan; Kevin Foy; Raquel Reinbolt; Cassandra Grenade; Maryam Lustberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lorraine T Dean; Shadiya L Moss; Anne Marie McCarthy; Katrina Armstrong Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Tess Thompson; Maria Pérez; Matthew Kreuter; Julie Margenthaler; Graham Colditz; Donna B Jeffe Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Steven S Coughlin; Valerie Williams; Nicole Moore; Deborah Bowen; Judith Anglin; Nadine Mansur; Gianluca De Leo Journal: J Cancer Treatment Diagn Date: 2018-06-06
Authors: Maura K McCall; Mary Connolly; Bethany Nugent; Yvette P Conley; Catherine M Bender; Margaret Q Rosenzweig Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.037