Literature DB >> 26005596

A Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Lowers Cost of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Piya Das Ghatak1, Richard Schlanger1, Kasturi Ganesh1, Lynn Lambert1, Gayle M Gordillo1, Patsy Martinsek1, Sashwati Roy1.   

Abstract

Objective: To test whether the use of a wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) (Procellera®) in conjunction with a 5-day negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may reduce the number of dressing changes required per week with this therapy. Approach: At the Ohio State University Comprehensive Wound Center, chronic wound patients (n=30) undergoing NPWT were randomized into two arms following consent as approved by the institutional review board. The control arm received standard of care NPWT, where the dressing change was performed thrice a week. The test arm received the same care except that the WED was added as an interface layer and dressing change was limited to twice a week.
Results: A reduced cost of care was achieved using the WED in conjunction with NPWT. Despite fewer dressing changes in wounds dressed with the WED, closure outcomes were comparable with no overt signs of any wound complication, including infection. The cost of NPWT care during the week was significantly lower (from $2918 to $2346) in the WED-treated group compared with patients in the control arm. Innovation: This work introduces a novel technology platform involving a WED, which may be used in conjunction with NPWT. If used as such, NPWT is effective in decreasing the frequency of dressing change and lowering the cost of care.
Conclusion: This work points toward the benefit of using the WED combined with NPWT. A larger clinical trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of WED in wound care is warranted.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26005596      PMCID: PMC4432941          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2014.0615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  24 in total

Review 1.  The cost-effectiveness of topical negative pressure versus other wound-healing therapies.

Authors:  G Neubauer; R Ujlaky
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  Low-cost topical negative pressure wound dressing system.

Authors:  J Gnanaraj
Journal:  Trop Doct       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.731

Review 3.  Negative pressure wound therapy: an examination of cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Mona Mylene Baharestani
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Wound healing and cost-saving benefits of combining negative-pressure wound therapy with silver.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Karr; Fernando Loret de Mola; Tri Pham; Leslie Tooke
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.347

5.  Silver from polyurethane dressing is delivered by gradient to exudate, tissue, and serum of patients undergoing negative-pressure wound treatment.

Authors:  René F Abarca-Buis; Nadia M Munguía; Juan Manuel Melchor Gonzalez; Lilia Solís-Arrieta; Liliana Saldivar y Osorio; Edgar Krötzsch
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.347

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy-associated tissue trauma and pain: a controlled in vivo study comparing foam and gauze dressing removal by immunohistochemistry for substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in the wound edge.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Lotta Gustafsson; Sandra Lindstedt; Richard Ingemansson
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Evaluation of chronic wound treatment with the SNaP wound care system versus modern dressing protocols.

Authors:  Bruce Lerman; Leslie Oldenbrook; Shaundra L Eichstadt; Justin Ryu; Kenton D Fong; Peter J Schubart
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  [Cost-effectiveness analysis of vacuum-assisted closure in the surgical wound bed preparation of soft tissue injuries].

Authors:  B Le Franc; O Sellal; G Grimandi; F Duteille
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 0.660

9.  Cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for postsurgical patients in long-term acute care.

Authors:  Jean M de Leon; Sunni Barnes; Melody Nagel; Michelle Fudge; Adora Lucius; Betty Garcia
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Silver-zinc redox-coupled electroceutical wound dressing disrupts bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  Jaideep Banerjee; Piya Das Ghatak; Sashwati Roy; Savita Khanna; Craig Hemann; Binbin Deng; Amitava Das; Jay L Zweier; Daniel Wozniak; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Electric Field Based Dressing Disrupts Mixed-Species Bacterial Biofilm Infection and Restores Functional Wound Healing.

Authors:  Kasturi Ganesh Barki; Amitava Das; Sriteja Dixith; Piya Das Ghatak; Shomita Mathew-Steiner; Elizabeth Schwab; Savita Khanna; Daniel J Wozniak; Sashwati Roy; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Disposable Patterned Electroceutical Dressing (PED-10) Is Safe for Treatment of Open Clinical Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Sashwati Roy; Shaurya Prakash; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Piya Das Ghatak; Varun Lochab; Travis H Jones; Prashanth Mohana Sundaram; Gayle M Gordillo; Vish V Subramaniam; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Biofilm Management in Wound Care.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Sashwati Roy; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Gayle M Gordillo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 5.169

4.  Direct current electric field regulates endothelial permeability under physiologically relevant fluid forces in a microfluidic vessel bifurcation model.

Authors:  Prashanth Mohana Sundaram; Kaushik K Rangharajan; Ehsan Akbari; Tanner J Hadick; Jonathan W Song; Shaurya Prakash
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  High-Voltage, Pulsed Electric Fields Eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa Stable Infection in a Mouse Burn Model.

Authors:  Mengjie Wu; Andrey Ethan Rubin; Tianhong Dai; Rene Schloss; Osman Berk Usta; Alexander Golberg; Martin Yarmush
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.947

6.  Electroceutical Approach for Impairing the Motility of Pathogenic Bacterium Using a Microfluidic Platform.

Authors:  Ryan Berthelot; Kristina Doxsee; Suresh Neethirajan
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Electric Factors in Wound Healing.

Authors:  Paulo Luiz Farber; Felipe Contoli Isoldi; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.947

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.