BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent years, the role of CTA and CTP for vasospasm diagnosis in the setting of ASAH has been the subject of many research studies. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of CTA and CTP for vasospasm in patients with ASAH by using DSA as the criterion standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search strategy for research studies was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews, including literature data bases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science) and reference lists of manuscripts published from January 1996 to February 2009. The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) published manuscripts, 2) original research studies with prospective or retrospective data, 3) patients with ASAH, 4) CTA or CTP as the index test, and 5) DSA as the reference standard. Three reviewers independently assessed the quality of these research studies by using the QUADAS tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, DOR, and the SROC curve were determined. RESULTS: CTA and CTP searches yielded 505 and 214 manuscripts, respectively. Ten research studies met inclusion criteria for each CTA and CTP search. Six CTA and 3 CTP studies had sufficient data for statistical analysis. CTA pooled estimates had 79.6% sensitivity (95%CI, 74.9%-83.8%), 93.1%specificity (95%CI, 91.7%-94.3%), 18.1 LR+ (95%CI, 7.3-45.0), and 0.2 LR- (95%CI, 0.1-0.4); and CTP pooled estimates had 74.1% sensitivity (95%CI, 58.7%- 86.2%), 93.0% specificity (95% CI, 79.6%-98.7%), 9.3 LR+ (95%CI, 3.4-25.9), and 0.2 LR- (95%CI, 0.04-1.2). Overall DORs were 124.5 (95%CI, 28.4-546.4) for CTA and 43.0 (95%CI, 6.5-287.1) for CTP. Area under the SROC curve was 98 ± 2.0%for CTA and 97 ± 3.0% for CTP. CONCLUSIONS: The high diagnostic accuracy determined for both CTA and CTP in this meta-analysis suggests that they are potentially valuable techniques for vasospasm diagnosis in ASAH. Awareness of these results may impact patient care by providing supportive evidence for more effective use of CTA and CTP imaging in ASAH.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent years, the role of CTA and CTP for vasospasm diagnosis in the setting of ASAH has been the subject of many research studies. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of CTA and CTP for vasospasm in patients with ASAH by using DSA as the criterion standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search strategy for research studies was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews, including literature data bases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science) and reference lists of manuscripts published from January 1996 to February 2009. The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) published manuscripts, 2) original research studies with prospective or retrospective data, 3) patients with ASAH, 4) CTA or CTP as the index test, and 5) DSA as the reference standard. Three reviewers independently assessed the quality of these research studies by using the QUADAS tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, DOR, and the SROC curve were determined. RESULTS:CTA and CTP searches yielded 505 and 214 manuscripts, respectively. Ten research studies met inclusion criteria for each CTA and CTP search. Six CTA and 3 CTP studies had sufficient data for statistical analysis. CTA pooled estimates had 79.6% sensitivity (95%CI, 74.9%-83.8%), 93.1%specificity (95%CI, 91.7%-94.3%), 18.1 LR+ (95%CI, 7.3-45.0), and 0.2 LR- (95%CI, 0.1-0.4); and CTP pooled estimates had 74.1% sensitivity (95%CI, 58.7%- 86.2%), 93.0% specificity (95% CI, 79.6%-98.7%), 9.3 LR+ (95%CI, 3.4-25.9), and 0.2 LR- (95%CI, 0.04-1.2). Overall DORs were 124.5 (95%CI, 28.4-546.4) for CTA and 43.0 (95%CI, 6.5-287.1) for CTP. Area under the SROC curve was 98 ± 2.0%for CTA and 97 ± 3.0% for CTP. CONCLUSIONS: The high diagnostic accuracy determined for both CTA and CTP in this meta-analysis suggests that they are potentially valuable techniques for vasospasm diagnosis in ASAH. Awareness of these results may impact patient care by providing supportive evidence for more effective use of CTA and CTP imaging in ASAH.
Authors: Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: D G Nabavi; L M LeBlanc; B Baxter; D H Lee; A J Fox; S P Lownie; G G Ferguson; R A Craen; A W Gelb; T Y Lee Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Walter L Devillé; Frank Buntinx; Lex M Bouter; Victor M Montori; Henrica C W de Vet; Danielle A W M van der Windt; P Dick Bezemer Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Penny Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2003-11-10 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Edward D Greenberg; Y Pierre Gobin; Howard Riina; Carl E Johnson; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Joseph Comunale; Pina C Sanelli Journal: Imaging Med Date: 2011-06-01
Authors: A M Mendrik; E P A Vonken; G A P de Kort; B van Ginneken; E J Smit; M A Viergever; M Prokop Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: P C Sanelli; I Ugorec; C E Johnson; J Tan; A Z Segal; M Fink; L A Heier; A J Tsiouris; J P Comunale; M John; P E Stieg; R D Zimmerman; A I Mushlin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Charlotte H P Cremers; Irene C van der Schaaf; Emerens Wensink; Jacoba P Greving; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Birgitta K Velthuis; Mervyn D I Vergouwen Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 6.200