Literature DB >> 12111876

Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data.

S D Walter1.   

Abstract

The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve has been recommended to represent the performance of a diagnostic test, based on data from a meta-analysis. However, little is known about the basic properties of the SROC curve or its estimate. In this paper, the position of the SROC curve is characterized in terms of the overall diagnostic odds ratio and the magnitude of inter-study heterogeneity in the odds ratio. The area under the curve (AUC) and an index Q(*) are discussed as potentially useful summaries of the curve. It is shown that AUC is maximized when the study odds ratios are homogeneous, and that it is quite robust to heterogeneity. An upper bound is derived for AUC based on an exact analytic expression for the homogeneous situation, and a lower bound based on the limit case Q(*), defined by the point where sensitivity equals specificity: Q(*) is invariant to heterogeneity. The standard error of AUC is derived for homogeneous studies, and shown to be a reasonable approximation with heterogeneous studies. The expressions for AUC and its standard error are easily computed in the homogeneous case, and avoid the need for numerical integration in the more general case. SE(AUC) and SE(Q(*)) are found to be numerically close, with SE(Q(*)) being larger if the odds ratio is very large. The methods are illustrated using data for the Pap smear screening test for cervical cancer, and for three tests for the diagnosis of metastases in cervical cancer patients. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12111876     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  212 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Effect of verification bias on the sensitivity of fecal occult blood testing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan S Rosman; Mark A Korsten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography and CT perfusion for cerebral vasospasm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E D Greenberg; R Gold; M Reichman; M John; J Ivanidze; A M Edwards; C E Johnson; J P Comunale; P Sanelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Chuan Hong; Yang Ning; Xiao Su
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and squamous cell carcinoma antigen-immunoglobulin M for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Chuxiao Shao; Qingyun Zhou; Yimin Zhu; Jinde Zhu; Chaoyong Tu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-08

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Laure Champ-Rigot; Rémy Morello; John W Riddell; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs for lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongchun Shen; Tao Wang; Ting Yang; Qianjing Hu; Chun Wan; Lei Chen; Fuqiang Wen
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-02-06

8.  Screening for depression in medical settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simon Gilbody; David Richards; Stephen Brealey; Catherine Hewitt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  A systematic review of commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Karen R Steingart; Megan Henry; Suman Laal; Philip C Hopewell; Andrew Ramsay; Dick Menzies; Jane Cunningham; Karin Weldingh; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Bayesian Adaptation of the Summary ROC Curve Method for Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Performance.

Authors:  Scott W Miller; Debajyoti Sinha; Elizabeth H Slate; Donald Garrow; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  J Data Sci       Date:  2009-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.