PURPOSE: To study the reproducibility and variability of iridocorneal angle (ICA) measurements by using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) by expert and nonexpert observers. METHODS: Twenty-three healthy volunteers (nonexperts with a basic knowledge of ophthalmology) acquired five consecutive AS-OCT images in the enhanced anterior segment single mode in the 180° to 0° meridian of the right eyes of their peers. Two experts and the 23 nonexperts analyzed the images. The ICA software tool was used to determine the angle opening distance (AOD) and the trabecular iris surface area (TISA) at 500 and 750 μm. A random intercept model was fitted to evaluate the variability of acquiring an image. For both the experts and the nonexperts, inter- and intraobserver variability of analyzing an AS-OCT image was determined with the coefficient of variation (CV). Reproducibility was qualified by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the variability of acquiring an image. The range of intraobserver variability in image analysis was from 9.4% to 12.5% in the experts and from 4.2% to 17.4% in the nonexperts. Interobserver variability was 10.7% in the experts and 10.2% in the nonexperts. The reproducibility was high, 0.875 and 0.942 in the experts and 0.906 in the nonexperts. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reproducibility of the ICA measurements with the AS-OCT is good in open angles. Inter- and intraobserver variability showed similar mean values of reproducibility between the experts and nonexperts. The wide range of intraobserver variation in the nonexperts suggests that this group should undergo extensive instruction before routinely analyzing AS-OCT images.
PURPOSE: To study the reproducibility and variability of iridocorneal angle (ICA) measurements by using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) by expert and nonexpert observers. METHODS: Twenty-three healthy volunteers (nonexperts with a basic knowledge of ophthalmology) acquired five consecutive AS-OCT images in the enhanced anterior segment single mode in the 180° to 0° meridian of the right eyes of their peers. Two experts and the 23 nonexperts analyzed the images. The ICA software tool was used to determine the angle opening distance (AOD) and the trabecular iris surface area (TISA) at 500 and 750 μm. A random intercept model was fitted to evaluate the variability of acquiring an image. For both the experts and the nonexperts, inter- and intraobserver variability of analyzing an AS-OCT image was determined with the coefficient of variation (CV). Reproducibility was qualified by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the variability of acquiring an image. The range of intraobserver variability in image analysis was from 9.4% to 12.5% in the experts and from 4.2% to 17.4% in the nonexperts. Interobserver variability was 10.7% in the experts and 10.2% in the nonexperts. The reproducibility was high, 0.875 and 0.942 in the experts and 0.906 in the nonexperts. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reproducibility of the ICA measurements with the AS-OCT is good in open angles. Inter- and intraobserver variability showed similar mean values of reproducibility between the experts and nonexperts. The wide range of intraobserver variation in the nonexperts suggests that this group should undergo extensive instruction before routinely analyzing AS-OCT images.
Authors: Handan Akil; Kenneth Marion; Anna Dastiridou; Dennis Jenkins; Brendan Kramer; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Florian Beer; Andreas Wartak; Richard Haindl; Martin Gröschl; Bernhard Baumann; Michael Pircher; Christoph K Hitzenberger Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Kenneth M Marion; Jyotsna Maram; Xiaojing Pan; Anna Dastiridou; ZhouYuan Zhang; Alex Ho; Brian A Francis; Srinivas R Sadda; Vikas Chopra Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Tong Zhao; Mengya Zhao; Qinghong Xie; Christopher W Fong; Jeremy Chen; Yingna Liu; Hui Feng; Shuning Li; Benjamin F Arnold; Tin Aung; Mingguang He; Julius T Oatts; Ying Han Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Andri K Riau; Neil Y S Tan; Romesh I Angunawela; Hla M Htoon; Shyam S Chaurasia; Jodhbir S Mehta Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2012-08-19 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Ricardo J Cumba; Sunita Radhakrishnan; Nicholas P Bell; Kundandeep S Nagi; Alice Z Chuang; Shan C Lin; Kimberly A Mankiewicz; Robert M Feldman Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Anna K Nowinska; Sławomir J Teper; Dominika A Janiszewska; Anita Lyssek-Boron; Dariusz Dobrowolski; Robert Koprowski; Edward Wylegala Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 3.411