Literature DB >> 28724784

Representing delayed force feedback as a combination of current and delayed states.

Guy Avraham1,2, Firas Mawase3, Amir Karniel4,2, Lior Shmuelof2,5, Opher Donchin4,2, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi6,7,8, Ilana Nisky4,2.   

Abstract

To adapt to deterministic force perturbations that depend on the current state of the hand, internal representations are formed to capture the relationships between forces experienced and motion. However, information from multiple modalities travels at different rates, resulting in intermodal delays that require compensation for these internal representations to develop. To understand how these delays are represented by the brain, we presented participants with delayed velocity-dependent force fields, i.e., forces that depend on hand velocity either 70 or 100 ms beforehand. We probed the internal representation of these delayed forces by examining the forces the participants applied to cope with the perturbations. The findings showed that for both delayed forces, the best model of internal representation consisted of a delayed velocity and current position and velocity. We show that participants relied initially on the current state, but with adaptation, the contribution of the delayed representation to adaptation increased. After adaptation, when the participants were asked to make movements with a higher velocity for which they had not previously experienced with the delayed force field, they applied forces that were consistent with current position and velocity as well as delayed velocity representations. This suggests that the sensorimotor system represents delayed force feedback using current and delayed state information and that it uses this representation when generalizing to faster movements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The brain compensates for forces in the body and the environment to control movements, but it is unclear how it does so given the inherent delays in information transmission and processing. We examined how participants cope with delayed forces that depend on their arm velocity 70 or 100 ms beforehand. After adaptation, participants applied opposing forces that revealed a partially correct representation of the perturbation using the current and the delayed information.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; delay; force field; motor primitives; reaching

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28724784      PMCID: PMC5626903          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00347.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  65 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cerebellum predicts the future motor state.

Authors:  Timothy J Ebner; Siavash Pasalar
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Perception and Action in Teleoperated Needle Insertion.

Authors:  I Nisky; A Pressman; C M Pugh; F A Mussa-Ivaldi; A Karniel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Synchronized brain network associated with essential tremor as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Alfons Schnitzler; Christian Münks; Markus Butz; Lars Timmermann; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 10.338

9.  The role of premotor cortex and the supplementary motor area in the temporal control of movement in man.

Authors:  U Halsband; N Ito; J Tanji; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 10.  The neurobiology of epilepsy.

Authors:  Helen E Scharfman
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.081

View more
  4 in total

1.  The absence or temporal offset of visual feedback does not influence adaptation to novel movement dynamics.

Authors:  Erin McKenna; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Weiwei Zhou; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Raz Leib; Assaf Pressman; Lucia S Simo; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-26

3.  Neglect-Like Effects on Drawing Symmetry Induced by Adaptation to a Laterally Asymmetric Visuomotor Delay.

Authors:  Chen Avraham; Guy Avraham; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The effect of tactile augmentation on manipulation and grip force control during force-field adaptation.

Authors:  Chen Avraham; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.