Literature DB >> 20869276

Use of the Copper T380A intrauterine device by adolescent mothers: continuation and method failure.

Loral Patchen1, Erica K Berggren.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: This report contributes to limited empirical data regarding use of the Copper T380A intrauterine device among adolescent mothers.
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective case series of adolescent mothers aged 15 to 21 years whose index delivery occurred before age 18 and met study inclusion criteria.
SETTING: All adolescent mothers received obstetrics and gynecology care at one urban clinical site in Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: All participated in a teen secondary pregnancy prevention program from April 2002 to November 2008 and used the Copper T380A intrauterine device. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We abstracted data to evaluate intrauterine device utilization, expulsion, removal, and pregnancy diagnosis.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine adolescent mothers met inclusion criteria. Six patients had partial or complete expulsion (15%; 95% CI, 6-29), and 10 requested removal (26%; 95% CI, 14-41) within 24 months of placement. Four users (10%; 95% CI, 3-23) became pregnant. Three had an intrauterine device in place at time of conception, while one became pregnant due to unrecognized device expulsion.
CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, many adolescent mothers discontinued Copper T380A use within two years of placement. The numbers of patients were too limited to provide stable estimates of contraceptive effectiveness. Larger comparative studies will further evaluate both effectiveness and acceptability of this device among teen mothers.
Copyright © 2011 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20869276      PMCID: PMC3036766          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  12 in total

1.  Depo Now: preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Vaughn I Rickert; Lorraine Tiezzi; Judy Lipshutz; Jacquelyn León; Roger D Vaughan; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Intrauterine devices for adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Deans; David A Grimes
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  A nationwide cohort study of the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device in New Zealand adolescents.

Authors:  Helen Paterson; Janelle Ashton; Mira Harrison-Woolrych
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Revisiting the intrauterine contraceptive device in adolescents.

Authors:  Alina Toma; Mary Anne Jamieson
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  Risk factors for IUD failure: results of a large multicentre case-control study.

Authors:  Patrick Thonneau; Thierry Almont; Elise de La Rochebrochard; Bernard Maria
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women.

Authors:  D Hubacher; R Lara-Ricalde; D J Taylor; F Guerra-Infante; R Guzmán-Rodríguez
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Correlates of use of long-acting reversible methods of contraception among adolescent and young adult women.

Authors:  Amy K Whitaker; Annie M Dude; Amy Neustadt; Melissa L Gilliam
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 9.  Intrauterine device and upper-genital-tract infection.

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-16       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14-18 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380A.

Authors:  Emily M Godfrey; Lisa M Memmel; Amy Neustadt; Megha Shah; Antonia Nicosia; Mydhili Moorthie; Melissa Gilliam
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  5 in total

1.  Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use among Adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  C Emily Hendrick; Joshua N Cone; Jessica Cirullo; Julie Maslowsky
Journal:  Adolesc Res Rev       Date:  2019-07-12

2.  Contraception in HIV-positive female adolescents.

Authors:  Nadia T Kancheva Landolt; Sudrak Lakhonphon; Jintanat Ananworanich
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Postpartum contraception in adolescents: data from a single tertiary clinic in southeast of Turkey.

Authors:  Mustafa Kaplanoglu; Dilek Kaplanoglu; Mustafa Gokhan Usman
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-09-28

4.  Studies of acute and subchronic systemic toxicity associated with a copper/low-density polyethylene nanocomposite intrauterine device.

Authors:  Li-Xia Hu; Shi-Fu Hu; Meng Rao; Jing Yang; Hui Lei; Zhuo Duan; Wei Xia; Changhong Zhu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-08-31

Review 5.  Recent progress in advanced biomaterials for long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Mingzhe Yan; Yanming Zhang; Zhihang Wu; Yifei Li; Keke Dou; Banghui Wang; Yingruo Wang; Qihui Zhou
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 10.435

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.