Literature DB >> 17185202

Depo Now: preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents and young adults.

Vaughn I Rickert1, Lorraine Tiezzi, Judy Lipshutz, Jacquelyn León, Roger D Vaughan, Carolyn Westhoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the immediate administration of DMPA (Depo Now) to the immediate use of short-term hormonal methods that served as a "bridge method" until later DMPA initiation. We examined whether Depo Now, as compared to initiating with a bridge method (pills, transdermal patch, or vaginal ring), resulted in greater DMPA continuation at six months.
METHODS: Young women aged 14 to 26 years seeking to use DMPA were randomized (nonblinded) after meeting eligibility criteria to either the Depo Now (n = 101) or bridge method (n = 232) group. Depo Now subjects received their first injection of DMPA at the conclusion of their first visit provided each was medically suitable and had a negative urine pregnancy test regardless of menstrual cycle day. Those assigned to the bridge method group were allowed to choose their starting contraceptive method and it was provided at the first visit. All subjects were told to return to the clinic in 21 days to repeat the urine pregnancy test, and among those who were assigned to use a bridge method, to receive their first injection of DMPA. All subjects were followed to their third injection, or about 6 months later.
RESULTS: Those randomized to a bridge method were 1.8 (1.1, 2.9) times more likely than Depo Now subjects to return for their 21-day repeat pregnancy test, but only 55% (n = 125) of these young women actually received their first DMPA injection. Continuation rates at the third injection were 29.7% (n = 30) for those in the Depo Now group and 21.1% (n = 49) for those assigned to the bridge method (p = .09). Three factors were significantly associated with adherence to the third injection: randomized to Depo Now group, knowing more women who use DMPA, and returning to clinic for the 21-day repeat pregnancy test visit. Finally, 28 pregnancies were diagnosed during the study period, and those in the bridge method group were almost 4.0 (1.2, 13.4) times more likely to be diagnosed with a pregnancy than those in the Depo Now group.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate administration of DMPA is associated with improved adherence to DMPA continuation and fewer pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17185202     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  12 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of self versus clinical administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Authors:  Anitra Beasley; Katharine O'Connell White; Serge Cremers; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Universal access to no-cost contraception for youth in Canada.

Authors:  Giuseppina Di Meglio; Elisabeth Yorke
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 3.  Contraceptive care for Canadian youth.

Authors:  Giuseppina Di Meglio; Colleen Crowther; Joanne Simms
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 4.  Emergency contraception review: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Elizabeth G Raymond; Elizabeth Westley; James Trussell
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 5.  Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Sara J Newmann; David A Grimes; Kavita Nanda; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

6.  Use of the Copper T380A intrauterine device by adolescent mothers: continuation and method failure.

Authors:  Loral Patchen; Erica K Berggren
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders; Ivana S Thompson; Pamela A Royer; Jennifer Eggebroten; Lori M Gawron
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 8.  Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents.

Authors:  Chioma Oringanje; Martin M Meremikwu; Hokehe Eko; Ekpereonne Esu; Anne Meremikwu; John E Ehiri
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-03

Review 9.  Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.

Authors:  Jamie Krashin; Jennifer H Tang; Sheila Mody; Laureen M Lopez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-17

Review 10.  Improving Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review of Potential Interventions.

Authors:  Rehana A Salam; Anadil Faqqah; Nida Sajjad; Zohra S Lassi; Jai K Das; Miriam Kaufman; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.