Literature DB >> 19442775

Intrauterine devices for adolescents: a systematic review.

Elizabeth I Deans1, David A Grimes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The appropriateness of IUDs for adolescents remains unsettled, as does the definition of the term adolescent. Unplanned pregnancy among teenagers remains epidemic, and long-acting methods, such as IUDs, offer the promise of top-tier effectiveness. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of the literature concerning IUD use in adolescents using MEDLINE, Popline, EMBASE and CINAHL databases.
RESULTS: Six cohort studies and seven case-series reports met our inclusion criteria; none included IUDs in current use in the United States. Overall, continuation rates were high and cumulative pregnancy rates low, ranging from 2% at 6 months to 11% at 48 months. Compared with combined oral contraceptives, IUDs had similar or better continuation rates; pregnancy rates were similar at 2 years. IUD expulsion rates may be inversely related to age.
CONCLUSIONS: The literature on IUD use among adolescents is scanty and obsolete. Nevertheless, published reports were generally reassuring. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing contemporary IUDs with other methods are urgently needed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442775     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  Duration of use of a levonorgestrel IUS amongst nulliparous and adolescent women.

Authors:  Tiffany Behringer; Matthew F Reeves; Brianna Rossiter; Beatrice A Chen; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine; Kirsten Thompson; Jillian T Henderson; Maya Blum; Debbie Postlethwaite; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  The Use of ACOG Guidelines: Perceived Contraindications to IUD and Implant Use Among Family Planning Providers.

Authors:  Ash E Philliber; Heather Hirsch; Claire D Brindis; Rita Turner; Susan Philliber
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

4.  Use of the Copper T380A intrauterine device by adolescent mothers: continuation and method failure.

Authors:  Loral Patchen; Erica K Berggren
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women.

Authors:  Jessica R Rosenstock; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Menstrual concerns and intrauterine contraception among adolescent bariatric surgery patients.

Authors:  Jennifer B Hillman; Rachel J Miller; Thomas H Inge
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents.

Authors:  Colleen McNicholas; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  Contraception for adolescents with lupus.

Authors:  Melissa S Tesher; Amy Whitaker; Melissa Gilliam; Linda Wagner-Weiner; Karen B Onel
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.054

9.  Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Tod Aeby
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

10.  Incidence of Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Adolescent and Young Adult Women Served by an Urban Primary Care Clinic.

Authors:  Katharine K Sznajder; Kathy S Tomaszewski; Anne E Burke; Maria Trent
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 1.814

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.