Literature DB >> 20868706

Patient-specific non-linear finite element modelling for predicting soft organ deformation in real-time: application to non-rigid neuroimage registration.

Adam Wittek1, Grand Joldes, Mathieu Couton, Simon K Warfield, Karol Miller.   

Abstract

Long computation times of non-linear (i.e. accounting for geometric and material non-linearity) biomechanical models have been regarded as one of the key factors preventing application of such models in predicting organ deformation for image-guided surgery. This contribution presents real-time patient-specific computation of the deformation field within the brain for six cases of brain shift induced by craniotomy (i.e. surgical opening of the skull) using specialised non-linear finite element procedures implemented on a graphics processing unit (GPU). In contrast to commercial finite element codes that rely on an updated Lagrangian formulation and implicit integration in time domain for steady state solutions, our procedures utilise the total Lagrangian formulation with explicit time stepping and dynamic relaxation. We used patient-specific finite element meshes consisting of hexahedral and non-locking tetrahedral elements, together with realistic material properties for the brain tissue and appropriate contact conditions at the boundaries. The loading was defined by prescribing deformations on the brain surface under the craniotomy. Application of the computed deformation fields to register (i.e. align) the preoperative and intraoperative images indicated that the models very accurately predict the intraoperative deformations within the brain. For each case, computing the brain deformation field took less than 4 s using an NVIDIA Tesla C870 GPU, which is two orders of magnitude reduction in computation time in comparison to our previous study in which the brain deformation was predicted using a commercial finite element solver executed on a personal computer.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868706      PMCID: PMC3107968          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  37 in total

1.  Registration of 3-D intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite-element biomechanical model.

Authors:  M Ferrant; A Nabavi; B Macq; F A Jolesz; R Kikinis; S K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  In vivo quantification of retraction deformation modeling for updated image-guidance during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Leah A Platenik; Michael I Miga; David W Roberts; Karen E Lunn; Francis E Kennedy; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Real-Time Nonlinear Finite Element Computations on GPU - Application to Neurosurgical Simulation.

Authors:  Grand Roman Joldes; Adam Wittek; Karol Miller
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 6.756

4.  Elastomechanical characterization of brain tissues.

Authors:  K B Sahay; R Mehrotra; U Sachdeva; A K Banerji
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Identifying the mechanical properties of tissue by ultrasound strain imaging.

Authors:  Emre Turgay; Septimiu Salcudean; Robert Rohling
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  On the unimportance of constitutive models in computing brain deformation for image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Adam Wittek; Trent Hawkins; Karol Miller
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2008-02-02

7.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  W M Wells; P Viola; H Atsumi; S Nakajima; R Kikinis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory.

Authors:  K Miller; K Chinzei
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Calculation of brain elastic parameters in vivo.

Authors:  E K Walsh; A Schettini
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1984-10

10.  IA-FEMesh: an open-source, interactive, multiblock approach to anatomic finite element model development.

Authors:  Nicole M Grosland; Kiran H Shivanna; Vincent A Magnotta; Nicole A Kallemeyn; Nicole A DeVries; Srinivas C Tadepalli; Curtis Lisle
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  22 in total

1.  Patient-specific biomechanical model as whole-body CT image registration tool.

Authors:  Mao Li; Karol Miller; Grand Roman Joldes; Barry Doyle; Revanth Reddy Garlapati; Ron Kikinis; Adam Wittek
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Suite of meshless algorithms for accurate computation of soft tissue deformation for surgical simulation.

Authors:  Grand Joldes; George Bourantas; Benjamin Zwick; Habib Chowdhury; Adam Wittek; Sudip Agrawal; Konstantinos Mountris; Damon Hyde; Simon K Warfield; Karol Miller
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Efficient inverse isoparametric mapping algorithm for whole-body computed tomography registration using deformations predicted by nonlinear finite element modeling.

Authors:  Mao Li; Adam Wittek; Karol Miller
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Biomechanical modeling and computer simulation of the brain during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Karol Miller; Grand R Joldes; George Bourantas; Simon K Warfield; Damon E Hyde; Ron Kikinis; Adam Wittek
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 5.  Computational Modeling for Enhancing Soft Tissue Image Guided Surgery: An Application in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Michael I Miga
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Beyond finite elements: a comprehensive, patient-specific neurosurgical simulation utilizing a meshless method.

Authors:  K Miller; A Horton; G R Joldes; A Wittek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  On the prospect of patient-specific biomechanics without patient-specific properties of tissues.

Authors:  Karol Miller; Jia Lu
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-02-09

8.  More accurate neuronavigation data provided by biomechanical modeling instead of rigid registration.

Authors:  Revanth Reddy Garlapati; Aditi Roy; Grand Roman Joldes; Adam Wittek; Ahmed Mostayed; Barry Doyle; Simon Keith Warfield; Ron Kikinis; Neville Knuckey; Stuart Bunt; Karol Miller
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Biomechanical model as a registration tool for image-guided neurosurgery: evaluation against BSpline registration.

Authors:  Ahmed Mostayed; Revanth Reddy Garlapati; Grand Roman Joldes; Adam Wittek; Aditi Roy; Ron Kikinis; Simon K Warfield; Karol Miller
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Biomechanical model for computing deformations for whole-body image registration: A meshless approach.

Authors:  Mao Li; Karol Miller; Grand Roman Joldes; Ron Kikinis; Adam Wittek
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.