Literature DB >> 20864299

Stroke and death after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting with and without high risk criteria.

Kristina A Giles1, Allen D Hamdan, Frank B Pomposelli, Mark C Wyers, Marc L Schermerhorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement criteria for carotid artery stenting (CAS) require that patients be high surgical risk or enrolled in a clinical trial. This may bias comparisons of CAS and carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We evaluate mortality and stroke following CAS and CEA stratified by medical high risk criteria.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2004-2007) was queried by ICD-9 code for CAS and CEA with diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Medical high risk criteria were identified for each patient including patients undergoing a coronary artery bypass and/or valve repair (CABG/V) during the same admission. Symptom status was defined by history of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and/or amarosis fugax. The primary outcome was postoperative death, stroke (complication code 997.02), and combined stroke or death, stratified by high risk vs non-high risk status and symptom status.
RESULTS: Patient totals of 56,564 (10.5%) CAS and 482,394 (89.5%) CEA were identified. Half of the patients in each group were high risk. CABG/V was performed less commonly with CAS than CEA (2.8% vs 4.0%, P < .001). Patients undergoing CAS were more likely symptomatic than those undergoing CEA (13.1% vs 9.4%, P < .001). Mortality was higher after CAS than CEA for both high risk and non-high risk patients. Stroke was also higher after CAS for both high risk and non-high risk patients. Combined stroke or death was higher after CAS again for both high risk (asymptomatic 1.5% vs 1.2%, P < .05, symptomatic 14.4% vs 6.9%, P < .001) and non-high risk (asymptomatic 1.8% vs 0.6%, P < .001, symptomatic 11.8% vs 4.9%, P < .001). Combined stroke or death for patients undergoing CABG/V during the same admission was similar for CAS and CEA (4.8% vs 3.2%, P = .19). Multivariate predictors of combined stroke or death adjusted for age and gender included CAS vs CEA (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, P < .001), symptom status (OR 6.8, P < .001), high risk (OR 1.6, P < .001), and earlier year of procedure (OR 1.1, P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: In the United States from 2004 to 2007, CAS has a higher risk of stroke and death than CEA after adjustment for medical high risk criteria. Further analysis with prospective assessment of risk factors is needed to guide appropriate patient selection for CEA and CAS in the general population.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20864299      PMCID: PMC3005797          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  30 in total

1.  Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial.

Authors:  A R Naylor; A Bolia; R J Abbott; I F Pye; J Smith; N Lennard; A J Lloyd; N J London; P R Bell
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics.

Authors:  D E Wennberg; F L Lucas; J D Birkmeyer; C E Bredenberg; E S Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Simultaneous carotid and coronary disease: safety of the combined approach.

Authors:  R P Cambria; B L Ivarsson; C W Akins; A C Moncure; D C Brewster; W M Abbott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  An analysis of perioperative surgical mortality and morbidity in the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. ACAS Investigators. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors:  B Young; W S Moore; J T Robertson; J F Toole; C B Ernst; S N Cohen; J P Broderick; R J Dempsey; J D Hosking
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Stent placement for arterial and venous cerebrovascular disease: preliminary experience.

Authors:  M P Marks; M D Dake; G K Steinberg; A M Norbash; B Lane
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Carotid artery repair for radiation-associated atherosclerosis is a safe and durable procedure.

Authors:  V S Kashyap; W S Moore; W J Quinones-Baldrich
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Stenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients.

Authors:  E B Diethrich; M Ndiaye; D B Reid
Journal:  J Endovasc Surg       Date:  1996-02

10.  Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: systematic review.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; J Slattery; C P Warlow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-12-13
View more
  19 in total

1.  The impact of the present on admission indicator on the accuracy of administrative data for carotid endarterectomy and stenting.

Authors:  Margriet Fokkema; Rob Hurks; Thomas Curran; Rodney P Bensley; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Frans L Moll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus stenting in comparable medical risk patients.

Authors:  Emily L Spangler; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; David H Stone; Marc L Schermerhorn; Richard J Powell; Jack L Cronenwett; Brian W Nolan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Contemporary outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in high-risk anatomic and physiologic patients.

Authors:  Vaishnavi Rao; Patric Liang; Nicholas Swerdlow; Chun Li; Yoel Solomon; Mark Wyers; Marc Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Surgical and Endovascular Treatment of Extracranial Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Hans-Henning Eckstein; Pavlos Tsantilas; Andreas Kühnl; Bernhard Haller; Thorben Breitkreuz; Alexander Zimmermann; Michael Kallmayer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Frequency of acute changes found on head computed tomographies in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shaila Khan; Carmen Guerra; Alexander Khandji; Rebecca M Bauer; Jan Claassen; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  A comparative analysis of long-term mortality after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Pablo Martinez-Camblor; Todd A MacKenzie; Ravinder Kang; Spencer W Trooboff; Philip P Goodney; A James O'Malley
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Accuracy of administrative data versus clinical data to evaluate carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting.

Authors:  Rodney P Bensley; Shunsuke Yoshida; Ruby C Lo; Margriet Fokkema; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Elliot L Chaikof; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  The impact of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services high-risk criteria on outcome after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in the SVS Vascular Registry.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Margriet Fokkema; Philip Goodney; Ellen D Dillavou; Jeffrey Jim; Christopher T Kenwood; Flora S Siami; Rodney A White
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  The current national criteria for carotid artery stenting overestimate its efficacy in patients who are symptomatic and at high risk.

Authors:  Shunsuke Yoshida; Rodney P Bensley; Julia D Glaser; Christoph S Nabzdyk; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Elliot L Chaikof; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.