Literature DB >> 31443978

Contemporary outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in high-risk anatomic and physiologic patients.

Vaishnavi Rao1, Patric Liang2, Nicholas Swerdlow2, Chun Li2, Yoel Solomon2, Mark Wyers2, Marc Schermerhorn3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines state that the acceptable 30-day postoperative stroke/death rate after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is <3% for asymptomatic patients and <6% for symptomatic patients. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has identified certain high-risk characteristics used to define patients at highest risk for CEA for whom carotid artery stenting would be reimbursed. We evaluated the impact of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services physiologic and anatomic high-risk criteria on major adverse event rates after CEA in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing CEA from 2011 to 2017 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program vascular targeted database. Patients with high-risk anatomic or physiologic characteristics were identified by a predefined variable and were compared with normal-risk patients. The primary outcome was 30-day stroke/death, stratified by symptom status.
RESULTS: We identified 25,788 patients undergoing CEA, of whom 60% were treated for asymptomatic carotid disease. Among all patients, high-risk physiology or anatomy was associated with higher rates of 30-day stroke/death compared with normal-risk patients (physiologic risk, 4.6% vs 2.3% [P < .001]; anatomic risk, 3.6% vs 2.3% [P < .001]). Patients who met criteria for high-risk physiology or anatomy also had higher rates of cardiac events (physiologic risk, 3.1% vs 1.6% [P < .001]; anatomic risk, 2.3% vs 1.6% [P < .01]), but only patients with high-risk anatomy had higher rates of cranial nerve injury (physiologic risk, 2.4% vs 2.5% [P = .81]; anatomic risk, 4.3% vs 2.5% [P < .001]). Asymptomatic patients with high-risk physiology or anatomy had higher rates of 30-day stroke/death, especially in the physiologic high-risk group (physiologic risk, 4.7% vs 1.5% [P < .001]; anatomic risk, 2.6% vs 1.5% [P < .01]), compared with normal-risk patients. However, among symptomatic patients, differences in stroke/death were seen only with high-risk anatomic patients and not with high-risk physiologic patients (physiologic risk, 4.6% vs 3.4% [P = .12]; anatomic risk, 4.8% vs 3.4% [P = .01]).
CONCLUSIONS: As currently selected, contemporary real-world outcomes after CEA in asymptomatic carotid disease patients meeting high-risk physiologic criteria show an unacceptably high 30-day stroke/death rate, well above the 3% threshold. These results suggest the need for better selection of patients and preoperative optimization before elective CEA.
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery stenosis; Carotid endarterectomy; Cerebrovascular disease; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31443978      PMCID: PMC6926142          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  19 in total

1.  Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Robert W Hobson; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Wayne M Clark; William Brooks; Ariane Mackey; Michael D Hill; Pierre P Leimgruber; Alice J Sheffet; Virginia J Howard; Wesley S Moore; Jenifer H Voeks; L Nelson Hopkins; Donald E Cutlip; David J Cohen; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert D Ferguson; Stanley N Cohen; Joseph L Blackshear; Frank L Silver; J P Mohr; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease: executive summary.

Authors:  John J Ricotta; Ali Aburahma; Enrico Ascher; Mark Eskandari; Peter Faries; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Predicting risk of perioperative death and stroke after carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: derivation and validation of a clinical risk score.

Authors:  Linda Calvillo-King; Lei Xuan; Song Zhang; Stanley Tuhrim; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Overtreatment or Undertreatment of Carotid Disease: A Transatlantic Comparison of Carotid Endarterectomy Patient Cohorts.

Authors:  Alexander B Pothof; Ian D van Koeverden; Gerard Pasterkamp; Marc L Schermerhorn; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-04

5.  Stroke and death after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting with and without high risk criteria.

Authors:  Kristina A Giles; Allen D Hamdan; Frank B Pomposelli; Mark C Wyers; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Patients at elevated risk of major adverse events following endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Tiffany Y Wu; Gabriel Akopian; Steven G Katz
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Predictors of perioperative outcomes after carotid revascularization.

Authors:  Besma Nejim; Tammam Obeid; Isibor Arhuidese; Caitlin Hicks; Sophie Wang; Joseph Canner; Mahmoud Malas
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  The impact of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services high-risk criteria on outcome after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in the SVS Vascular Registry.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Margriet Fokkema; Philip Goodney; Ellen D Dillavou; Jeffrey Jim; Christopher T Kenwood; Flora S Siami; Rodney A White
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  R W Hobson; D G Weiss; W S Fields; J Goldstone; W S Moore; J B Towne; C B Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The current national criteria for carotid artery stenting overestimate its efficacy in patients who are symptomatic and at high risk.

Authors:  Shunsuke Yoshida; Rodney P Bensley; Julia D Glaser; Christoph S Nabzdyk; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Elliot L Chaikof; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  3 in total

1.  Efficiency of using a neurofeedback device in determining ischaemic early electroencephalography indicators in rabbits with acute brain ischaemia.

Authors:  Sonay Oğuz
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-19

2.  Transcervical approach for carotid artery stenting without flow reversal: A case report.

Authors:  Nguyen-Luu Giang; Tran Chi Cuong; Le Minh Thang; Ngo Minh Tuan; Nguyen-Dao Nhat Huy; Duong-Hoang Linh; Mai-Van Muong; Do Duc Thang; Nguyen-Van Trang; Nguyen Minh Duc
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-28

Review 3.  The less invasive paradox, why carotid artery stenting is not suitable for the high-risk patient.

Authors:  Matthew Machin; Safa Salim; Sarah Onida; Alun Huw Davies
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.