Literature DB >> 24927985

Frequency of acute changes found on head computed tomographies in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Shaila Khan1, Carmen Guerra2, Alexander Khandji3, Rebecca M Bauer4, Jan Claassen5, Hannah Wunsch6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The frequency of positive findings on computed tomography (CT) of the head in critically ill patients who develop neurologic dysfunction is not known.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cohort study of head CTs for patients admitted to 3 intensive care units from 2005 to 2010. We documented the frequency of acute changes for all head CTs and for the subgroup of patients with altered mental status (AMS). We also examined associations between patient characteristics or medications administered before head CT and the odds of an acute change on head CT using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: During 11 338 intensive care unit admissions, there were 901 eligible head CTs on 706 patients (6% of patients). Among head CTs, 155 (17.2%) assessed concern of new focal deficit, 99 (11.0%) concern for a seizure, and 635 (70.5%) for AMS. Acute changes were found on 109 (12.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0%-14.2%) of all head CTs, and 30% (22.4%-36.9%) of patients with focal deficits, 16.2% (8.8%-23.5%) of patients with seizures but only 7.4% (5.4%-9.4%) for patients with AMS. A diagnosis of sepsis was associated with a decreased odds of an acute change on head CT for all head CTs (odds ratio 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95; P = .028) but was not significantly associated with a decreased risk among the cohort of head CTs for AMS (odds ratio 0.82; 95% CI, 0.41-1.62; P = .56). No other factors were associated with an altered risk of acute change on head CT for all patients in our cohort or for those with AMS.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute changes on head CTs performed for concern regarding new focal neurologic deficit or seizures are frequent compared with those performed for AMS with a nonfocal examination. No specific patient characteristics or medications were associated with a large change in the likelihood of finding an acute change for patients with AMS.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT scan, x-ray; Critical care; Decision making; Intensive care unit; Radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24927985      PMCID: PMC4140975          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  31 in total

1.  Head computed tomography in medical intensive care unit patients: clinical indications.

Authors:  A L Rafanan; P Kakulavar; J Perl; J C Andrefsky; D R Nelson; A C Arroliga
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Physician-attributable differences in intensive care unit costs: a single-center study.

Authors:  Allan Garland; Ziad Shaman; John Baron; Alfred F Connors
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A systemic approach to containing health care spending.

Authors:  Ezekiel Emanuel; Neera Tanden; Stuart Altman; Scott Armstrong; Donald Berwick; François de Brantes; Maura Calsyn; Michael Chernew; John Colmers; David Cutler; Tom Daschle; Paul Egerman; Bob Kocher; Arnold Milstein; Emily Oshima Lee; John D Podesta; Uwe Reinhardt; Meredith Rosenthal; Joshua Sharfstein; Stephen Shortell; Andrew Stern; Peter R Orszag; Topher Spiro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Warfarin use in nursing home residents: results from the 2004 national nursing home survey.

Authors:  Parinaz K Ghaswalla; Spencer E Harpe; Patricia W Slattum
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2012-01-09

6.  Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules.

Authors:  A C M Pijnenburg; Afina S Glas; Marnix A J De Roos; Kjell Bogaard; Jeroen G Lijmer; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Rudolf M J M Butzelaar; Johannes N Keeman
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; R D McKnight; R C Nair; I McDowell; M Reardon; J P Stewart; J Maloney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The role of head computer tomographic scans on the management of MICU patients with neurological dysfunction.

Authors:  Daniel Salerno; Paul E Marik; Constantine Daskalakis; Paul Kolm; Frank Leone
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.510

9.  Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.

Authors:  I Stiell; G Wells; A Laupacis; R Brison; R Verbeek; K Vandemheen; C D Naylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02

Review 10.  Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Waydhas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1999-09-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of emergency head computed tomography in critically ill oncological patients.

Authors:  Cristian Pristavu; Adrian Martin; Anca Irina Ristescu; Emilia Patrascanu; Laura Gavril; Olguta Lungu; Madalin Manole; Daniel Rusu; Ioana Grigoras
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.991

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.