Literature DB >> 8798126

Stenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients.

E B Diethrich1, M Ndiaye, D B Reid.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of intravascular stents in the treatment of extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease.
METHODS: According to protocol, stent therapy was offered to symptomatic patients with > or = 70% arteriographically defined carotid stenoses or ulcerative lesions and, after September 1994, to asymptomatic patients with > or = 75% stenoses. From April 1993 to September 1995, 110 nonconsecutive patients (79 males; mean age 72 years, range 45 to 85) consented to participate in the study. The majority (79 [72%]) were asymptomatic. Lesions meeting the treatment criteria were in the proximal common (n = 3); mid common (n = 12); distal common (n = 8); internal (ICA) (n = 92); and external (n = 2) carotid arteries. Seven patients had bilateral ICA stenoses, and 17 patients were treated for postsurgical recurrent disease. The mean lesion length and diameter stenosis for all lesions were 12.4 +/- 9.2 mm and 86.5% +/- 10.6%, respectively. The procedures were performed either via direct percutaneous access to the cervical common carotid artery or through a retrograde femoral artery approach. Standard balloon dilation preceded deployment of balloon-expandable stents in most cases. No postprocedural anticoagulation was used (aspirin only).
RESULTS: In 110 patients (117 arteries) intended for treatment, 109 (99.0%) (116 arteries [99.1%]) were successfully treated with 129 stents (128 Palmaz, 1 Wallstent). One percutaneous procedure failed (0.9%) for technical reasons (stent could not be deployed) and was converted to carotid endarterectomy. Minor complications included 4 cases of spasm (successfully treated with papaverine); 1 flow-limiting dissection (stented); and 6 access-site problems. There were 7 strokes (2 major, 5 reversible) (6.4%) and 5 minor transient events (4.5%) that resolved within 24 hours. Three patients were converted to endarterectomy (2.7%) prior to discharge; 1 stroke patient expired (0.9%), and another patient died of an unrelated cardiac event in hospital. In the 30-day postprocedural period, 2 ICA stents occluded (patients asymptomatic). Clinical success at 30 days (no technical failure, death, endarterectomy, stroke, or occlusion) was 89.1% (98/110). Over a mean 7.6-month follow-up (range 2 to 31), no new neurological symptoms developed. Another stent occlusion at 2 months and one case of flow-limiting intimal hyperplasia at 7 months were detected on routine duplex scanning in asymptomatic patients. Life-table analysis shows an 89% cumulative primary patency rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this early experience, carotid stenting appears feasible from a technical standpoint, with good midterm patency. However, the incidence of neurological sequelae is a serious problem. Technical enhancements and a more aggressive antiplatelet regimen may have a positive impact on these events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798126     DOI: 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0042:SITCAI>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1074-6218


  47 in total

Review 1.  [Angiology update].

Authors:  C Ranke; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-05-15

Review 2.  Treatment of atherosclerotic disease at the cervical carotid bifurcation: current status and review of the literature.

Authors:  J J Connors; D Seidenwurm; J C Wojak; R W Hurst; M E Jensen; R Wallace; T Tomsick; J Barr; C Kerber; E Russell; G M Nesbit; A J Fox; F Y Tsai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Endovascular stenting for carotid artery stenosis: preliminary experience using the shape-memory- alloy-recoverable-technology (SMART) stent.

Authors:  C C Phatouros; R T Higashida; A M Malek; P M Meyers; T E Lempert; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Carotid artery stenting: technical considerations.

Authors:  J J Vitek; G S Roubin; N Al-Mubarek; G New; S S Iyer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Cerebrovascular angioplasty and stenting for the prevention of stroke.

Authors:  J C Chaloupka; J B Weigele; S Mangla; W S Lesley
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain.

Authors:  H J Jaeger; K D Mathias; R Drescher; E Hauth; G Bockisch; E Demirel; H M Gissler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Endoscopic approach for carotid artery surgery.

Authors:  F Rubino; R Nahouraii; H Deutsch; W King; W B Inabnet; M Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Ischemic Stroke Prevention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Diffusion/perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Gauvrit; Christine Delmaire; Hilde Henon; Stéphanie Debette; Mohamad al Koussa; Didier Leys; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; Xavier Leclerc
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.