Literature DB >> 20864070

Object-based auditory facilitation of visual search for pictures and words with frequent and rare targets.

Lucica Iordanescu1, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki.   

Abstract

Auditory and visual processes demonstrably enhance each other based on spatial and temporal coincidence. Our recent results on visual search have shown that auditory signals also enhance visual salience of specific objects based on multimodal experience. For example, we tend to see an object (e.g., a cat) and simultaneously hear its characteristic sound (e.g., "meow"), to name an object when we see it, and to vocalize a word when we read it, but we do not tend to see a word (e.g., cat) and simultaneously hear the characteristic sound (e.g., "meow") of the named object. If auditory-visual enhancements occur based on this pattern of experiential associations, playing a characteristic sound (e.g., "meow") should facilitate visual search for the corresponding object (e.g., an image of a cat), hearing a name should facilitate visual search for both the corresponding object and corresponding word, but playing a characteristic sound should not facilitate visual search for the name of the corresponding object. Our present and prior results together confirmed these experiential association predictions. We also recently showed that the underlying object-based auditory-visual interactions occur rapidly (within 220ms) and guide initial saccades towards target objects. If object-based auditory-visual enhancements are automatic and persistent, an interesting application would be to use characteristic sounds to facilitate visual search when targets are rare, such as during baggage screening. Our participants searched for a gun among other objects when a gun was presented on only 10% of the trials. The search time was speeded when a gun sound was played on every trial (primarily on gun-absent trials); importantly, playing gun sounds facilitated both gun-present and gun-absent responses, suggesting that object-based auditory-visual enhancements persistently increase the detectability of guns rather than simply biasing gun-present responses. Thus, object-based auditory-visual interactions that derive from experiential associations rapidly and persistently increase visual salience of corresponding objects.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20864070      PMCID: PMC3010345          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  22 in total

Review 1.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Unraveling multisensory integration: patchy organization within human STS multisensory cortex.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Brenna D Argall; Jerzy Bodurka; Jeff H Duyn; Alex Martin
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-10       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Cortical feedback depolarization waves: a mechanism of top-down influence on early visual areas.

Authors:  Per E Roland; Akitoshi Hanazawa; Calle Undeman; David Eriksson; Tamas Tompa; Hiroyuki Nakamura; Sonata Valentiniene; Bashir Ahmed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

Review 5.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful.

Authors:  Joel S Warm; Raja Parasuraman; Gerald Matthews
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Self-awareness affects vision.

Authors:  Eric L Smith; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.

Authors:  V Virsu; J Rovamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Characteristic sounds make you look at target objects more quickly.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Steven Franconeri; Jan Theeuwes; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed.

Authors:  Michael J Van Wert; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  15 in total

1.  Am I looking at a cat or a dog? Gaze in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia is subject to excessive taxonomic capture.

Authors:  Mustafa Seckin; M-Marsel Mesulam; Joel L Voss; Wei Huang; Emily J Rogalski; Robert S Hurley
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Semantic congruency but not temporal synchrony enhances long-term memory performance for audio-visual scenes.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Markus Huff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

3.  Audio-visual object search is changed by bilingual experience.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Scott R Schroeder; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Learned face-voice pairings facilitate visual search.

Authors:  L Jacob Zweig; Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

5.  An Association between Auditory-Visual Synchrony Processing and Reading Comprehension: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Julia Mossbridge; Jacob Zweig; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Eye movements as probes of lexico-semantic processing in a patient with primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Mustafa Seckin; M-Marsel Mesulam; Alfred W Rademaker; Joel L Voss; Sandra Weintraub; Emily J Rogalski; Robert S Hurley
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 0.881

7.  Interactive coding of visual spatial frequency and auditory amplitude-modulation rate.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Laura Ortega; Marcia Grabowecky; Julia Mossbridge; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Memory after visual search: Overlapping phonology, shared meaning, and bilingual experience influence what we remember.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Sayuri Hayakawa; Scott R Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Haptic guidance of overt visual attention.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Words, shape, visual search and visual working memory in 3-year-old children.

Authors:  Catarina Vales; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.