Literature DB >> 15917862

Gender variations of body composition, muscle strength and power output in morbid obesity.

C L Lafortuna1, N A Maffiuletti, F Agosti, A Sartorio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motor capabilities are reduced in obese (OB) individuals, and this impairment may result also from quantitative variation of muscle mass due to alterations in body composition.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the differences in body mass (BM) and composition, as well as in muscle strength (ST) and power output W(.) between OB and NW males and females, and to test the hypothesis that variations in body composition affect muscle performance in OB subjects. DESIGN AND METHODS: Body composition (determined by BIA with a two-compartment model), upper and lower limb maximum ST (evaluated with isotonic machines) and lower limb maximum anaerobic W(.) (measured with a jumping test) were studied in a group of 95 extremely OB subjects (OB: 28 males, 67 females; mean age+/-s.d.: 29.3+/-7.0 y; BMI: 41.2+/-4.4 kg/m(2)) and in a control group of 18 NW voluntary subjects (NW: eight males, 10 females; age: 30.3+/-5.3 y; BMI: 22.6+/-2.1 kg/m(2)).
RESULTS: OB male and female subjects differed significantly with increases in BM being attained by a similar contribution of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in male subjects, but mainly contributed by FM in female subjects. Compared with NW, both OB men and women had a greater amount of FFM (P<0.001) and, since a general linear correlation was found between ST and FFM (ST (N)=64.4 FFM (kg)-190.0, R(2)=0.612, P<0.001), they developed higher values of ST (P<0.05) than their respective NW counterparts. For the same reason, both OB and NW male subjects had higher ST (P<0.001) than their female counterparts. Correction for FFM eliminated all gender- and obesity-related ST differences. On the contrary, in spite of their higher absolute muscle strength, both OB men and women could develop absolute W(.) similar to that of NW subjects, and were notably less powerful per unit BM than NW subjects (P<0.001), women being most affected among the OB.
CONCLUSIONS: Obesity-related variation in body composition differs considerably by gender, and is responsible for differences in muscle performance: the higher muscle strength observed in OB subjects (both men and women) and in male subjects (both OB and NW) is accounted for by a greater amount of FFM. Nonetheless, biomechanical limitations appear to impair muscle power development during jumping in OB individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15917862     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  52 in total

1.  Hand-grip strength cut points to screen older persons at risk for mobility limitation.

Authors:  Janne Sallinen; Sari Stenholm; Taina Rantanen; Markku Heliövaara; Päivi Sainio; Seppo Koskinen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Gender-related changes in body composition, muscle strength and power output after a short-term multidisciplinary weight loss intervention in morbid obesity.

Authors:  A Sartorio; N A Maffiuletti; F Agosti; C L Lafortuna
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Fighting obesity: When muscle meets fat.

Authors:  Xin Yang; Pengpeng Bi; Shihuan Kuang
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Cell-autonomous regulation of fast troponin T pre-mRNA alternative splicing in response to mechanical stretch.

Authors:  Rudolf J Schilder; Scot R Kimball; Leonard S Jefferson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.249

5.  Body weight-dependent troponin T alternative splicing is evolutionarily conserved from insects to mammals and is partially impaired in skeletal muscle of obese rats.

Authors:  Rudolf J Schilder; Scot R Kimball; James H Marden; Leonard S Jefferson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Effect of mechanical and metabolic factors on motor function and fatigue in obese men and women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  C L Lafortuna; F Prinelli; F Adorni; F Agosti; A De Col; A Sartorio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Musculoskeletal Function and Obesity: Implications for Physical Activity.

Authors:  Sarah P Shultz; Nuala M Byrne; Andrew P Hills
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2014-09

8.  The combined effect of adiposity, fat distribution and age on cardiovascular risk factors and motor disability in a cohort of obese women (aged 18-83).

Authors:  C L Lafortuna; F Agosti; M Proietti; F Adorni; A Sartorio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  Sarcopenic obesity: definition, cause and consequences.

Authors:  Sari Stenholm; Tamara B Harris; Taina Rantanen; Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  The energy cost of cycling and aerobic performance of obese adolescent girls.

Authors:  C L Lafortuna; F Agosti; C Busti; R Galli; A Sartorio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.