Literature DB >> 20860780

Communicating uncertainty can lead to less decision satisfaction: a necessary cost of involving patients in shared decision making?

Mary C Politi1, Melissa A Clark, Hernando Ombao, Don Dizon, Glyn Elwyn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the large number of interventions of uncertain effectiveness, research on communicating uncertainty is needed to examine its impact on patients' health decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To examine physicians' communication of uncertainty and its impact on patients' decisions and decision satisfaction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included female patients seen in a breast health centre whose physicians were discussing a decision with them, with no clear 'best' choice based on outcome evidence. MAIN VARIABLES: Decision communication was measured using the OPTION scale, a measure of the degree to which physicians involve patients in a decision-making process. One-to-two weeks after the discussion, patients reported their satisfaction with the decision-making process and their decision. Decisions were verified in medical charts with patient consent.
RESULTS: Seventy-five women agreed to participate (94% response rate). The mean translated score of the OPTION scale was 68.0 (SD 18.3), but only 33.2 (SD 19.1) for the uncertainty items. Among cancer patients, communicating uncertainty was negatively related to decision satisfaction (P < 0.002), and there was an interaction between patient involvement in decisions and communicating uncertainty in relation to patients' decision satisfaction (P < 0.03). DISCUSSION: Communicating scientific uncertainty might lead to less decision satisfaction among women facing cancer treatment decisions; this could be a natural outcome of the decision making process. Involving patients in decisions might help them tolerate uncertainty.
CONCLUSION: Future studies should consider assessing other outcomes (e.g. knowledge, physician support) of the decision making process. There may be trade-offs between acknowledging uncertainty and immediate decision satisfaction.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20860780      PMCID: PMC3010418          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00626.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  27 in total

Review 1.  Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making.

Authors:  A Towle; W Godolphin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Talya Miron-Shatz
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Aiding medical decision making: a communication perspective.

Authors:  Richard L Street
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship.

Authors:  M S Henry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors:  C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Decision making about prophylactic oophorectomy among at-risk women: psychological influences and implications.

Authors:  S M Miller; C Y Fang; S L Manne; P F Engstrom; M B Daly
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care.

Authors:  M M Schapira; A B Nattinger; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Is information always a good thing? Helping patients make "good" decisions.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Elizabeth R Drake; George A Wells; Peter Tugwell; Andreas Laupacis; Tom Elmslie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Communicating Uncertainty: a Narrative Review and Framework for Future Research.

Authors:  Arabella L Simpkin; Katrina A Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A Qualitative Exploration of Clinician Views and Experiences of Treatment Decision-Making in Bipolar II Disorder.

Authors:  Alana Fisher; Vijaya Manicavasagar; Louise Sharpe; Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell; Ilona Juraskova
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-01-19

3.  Pulmonologists' Reported Use of Guidelines and Shared Decision-making in Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Christopher G Slatore; Chris Gillespie; Jack A Clark
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  High Levels of Decisional Conflict and Decision Regret When Making Decisions About Biologics.

Authors:  Ellen A Lipstein; Daniel J Lovell; Lee A Denson; Sandra C Kim; Charles Spencer; Richard F Ittenbach; Maria T Britto
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.839

5.  Clinical Equipoise and Shared Decision-making in Pulmonary Nodule Management. A Survey of American Thoracic Society Clinicians.

Authors:  Jonathan M Iaccarino; James Simmons; Michael K Gould; Christopher G Slatore; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-06

6.  Patient's recognition level of medical terms as estimated by pharmacists.

Authors:  Yasuko Yoshida; Yoshitoku Yoshida
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.674

7.  Language of Uncertainty: the Expression of Decisional Conflict Related to Skin Cancer Prevention Recommendations.

Authors:  Yulia A Strekalova; Vaughan S James
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department Among Patients With Limited Health Literacy: Beyond Slower and Louder.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Candace D McNaughton; Danielle M McCarthy; Erica Shelton; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Angela Young-Brinn; Donna Fowler; Corita Grudszen
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 9.  Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Sophie Desroches; Hubert Robitaille; Hugues Vaillancourt; Annie Leblanc; Stéphane Turcotte; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Expect the unexpected: patients' and families' expectations and experiences of new clinical procedures.

Authors:  Kathryn Ehrich; Luke Cowie; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.