Literature DB >> 12226584

Is information always a good thing? Helping patients make "good" decisions.

Peter A Ubel1.   

Abstract

In most cases, patient preferences are crucial in making good health care decisions. For example, choices between chemotherapy and radiation treatment usually hinge on trade-offs that only patients can decide about. In recognition of the importance of patient preferences in clinical decisions, health services researchers have begun developing decision aids to help patients understand complex medical information. But these decision aids might lead to "bad choices"-choices that are inconsistent with people's stated preferences. In this paper, the author provides examples of how people make inconsistent medical decisions, and briefly discusses future directions for exploring ways of structuring information so that patients are less likely to make inconsistent choices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12226584     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023954.85887.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  20 in total

1.  Too soon to give up: re-examining the value of advance directives.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Michael J Green
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; David E Kanouse; Steven C Martino; Dale Shaller; Lise Rybowski
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Andrea M Angott; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-11

4.  Decisional autonomy undermines advisees' judgments of experts in medicine and in life.

Authors:  Samantha Kassirer; Emma E Levine; Celia Gaertig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Communicating uncertainty can lead to less decision satisfaction: a necessary cost of involving patients in shared decision making?

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Melissa A Clark; Hernando Ombao; Don Dizon; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Designing computerized decision support that works for clinicians and families.

Authors:  Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2011-03

7.  Testing whether decision aids introduce cognitive biases: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Dylan M Smith; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Holly A Derry; Jennifer McClure; Azadeh Stark; Cheryl Wiese; Sarah Greene; Aleksandra Jankovic; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-12-09

8.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Shared decision-making in the primary care treatment of late-life major depression: a needed new intervention?

Authors:  Patrick J Raue; Herbert C Schulberg; Roberto Lewis-Fernandez; Carla Boutin-Foster; Amy S Hoffman; Martha L Bruce
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.485

10.  Fatalistic cancer beliefs and information sources among rural and urban adults in the USA.

Authors:  Christie A Befort; Niaman Nazir; Kimberly Engelman; Won Choi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.