Literature DB >> 12752738

A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions.

Annette M O'Connor1, Elizabeth R Drake, George A Wells, Peter Tugwell, Andreas Laupacis, Tom Elmslie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the decision-making needs of Canadians when faced with 'complex' health decisions characterized by balancing advantages against disadvantages. Although a national report emphasized that public confidence in the health-care system depends on support for personal knowledge and decision-making, there has been no systematic investigation of the Canadian population's decision-making needs.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey using random digit dialling. PARTICIPANTS: National sample of 635 adults over 18 years of age, living in Canada.
RESULTS: Forty-two percentage of eligible contacts participated. Sixty-five percent of contacts reported making 'complex' health decisions, commonly about medical or surgical treatments or birth control, and more commonly by women and by married/separated individuals. Most respondents took an active role in their decisions, often sharing the process with their partner or family. Being younger was associated with a more independent role. Physicians were more often involved in the decisions of respondents with less education. Fifty-nine percent of respondents experienced decisional conflict; more conflict was seen with those who were female and feeling uninformed about options, pressured to select one particular option, and unready or unskilled in decision-making. Less decisional conflict was seen in those who reported birth control decisions and in those who were 70 years and older. Participants used several strategies when deliberating about choices including: information gathering, clarifying their values, and seeking support and information from others. Personal counselling and printed information materials were commonly preferred methods of learning about options. 'Essential' criteria for judging satisfactory decision-making included: having sufficient knowledge about the options, outcomes, and probabilities; being clear about values; selecting and implementing a choice that agrees with personal values; and expressing satisfaction with the choice.
CONCLUSIONS: Canadians, particularly women, face difficult decisions and need support and information from credible sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12752738      PMCID: PMC5060179          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00215.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  15 in total

Review 1.  Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; V Fiset; C DeGrasse; I D Graham; W Evans; D Stacey; A Laupacis; P Tugwell
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Feasibility and effects of decision aids.

Authors:  S Molenaar; M A Sprangers; F C Postma-Schuit; E J Rutgers; J Noorlander; J Hendriks; H C de Haes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged?

Authors:  V A Entwistle; A J Sowden; I S Watt
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1998-04

5.  A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; P Tugwell; G A Wells; T Elmslie; E Jolly; G Hollingworth; R McPherson; H Bunn; I Graham; E Drake
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1998-03

6.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; A Rostom; V Fiset; J Tetroe; V Entwistle; H Llewellyn-Thomas; M Holmes-Rovner; M Barry; J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

8.  A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Man-Son-Hing; A Laupacis; A M O'Connor; J Biggs; E Drake; E Yetisir; R G Hart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Physicians' opinions about decision aids for patients considering systemic adjuvant therapy for axillary-node negative breast cancer.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; C Sawka; S P Pinfold; T To; D E Harrison
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997-02

10.  Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients.

Authors:  C G Blanchard; M S Labrecque; J C Ruckdeschel; E B Blanchard
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  32 in total

1.  Child health research in Canada: Alive and well?

Authors:  Peter Rosenbaum
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Patient experience with healthcare services among older adults with serious mental illness compared to the general older population.

Authors:  Karen L Fortuna; Matthew C Lohman; John A Batsis; Elizabeth A DiNapoli; Peter R DiMilia; Martha L Bruce; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.210

Review 3.  Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisa Tlach; Caroline Wüsten; Anne Daubmann; Sarah Liebherz; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Communicating uncertainty can lead to less decision satisfaction: a necessary cost of involving patients in shared decision making?

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Melissa A Clark; Hernando Ombao; Don Dizon; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Shared decision making and other variables as correlates of satisfaction with health care decisions in a United States national survey.

Authors:  Katherine Elizabeth Glass; Celia E Wills; Christopher Holloman; Jacklyn Olson; Catherine Hechmer; Carla K Miller; Anne-Marie Duchemin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-03-11

6.  Supporting patients facing difficult health care decisions: use of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.

Authors:  France Légaré; Annette C O'Connor; Ian Graham; Danielle Saucier; Luc Côté; Michel Cauchon; Line Paré
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions.

Authors:  Jodi Halpern; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Shared decision-making in the primary care treatment of late-life major depression: a needed new intervention?

Authors:  Patrick J Raue; Herbert C Schulberg; Roberto Lewis-Fernandez; Carla Boutin-Foster; Amy S Hoffman; Martha L Bruce
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.485

9.  Patients' involvement in decisions about medicines: GPs' perceptions of their preferences.

Authors:  Kate Cox; Nicky Britten; Richard Hooper; Patrick White
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  The relationships among knowledge, self-efficacy, preparedness, decisional conflict, and decisions to participate in a cancer clinical trial.

Authors:  S M Miller; S V Hudson; B L Egleston; S Manne; J S Buzaglo; K Devarajan; L Fleisher; J Millard; N Solarino; J Trinastic; N J Meropol
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.