Literature DB >> 20859749

Opportunistic predator prefers habitat complexity that exposes prey while reducing cannibalism and intraguild encounters.

Jason M Schmidt1, Ann L Rypstra.   

Abstract

Structural features of habitat are known to affect the density of predators and prey, and it is generally accepted that complexity provides some protection from the environment and predators but may also reduce foraging success. A next step in understanding these interactions is to decouple the impacts of both spatial and trophic ingredients of complexity to explicitly explore the trade-offs between the habitat, its effects on foraging success, and the competition that ensues as predator densities increase. We quantified the accumulation of spiders and their prey in habitat islands with different habitat complexities created in the field using natural plants, plant debris and plastic plant mimics. Spiders were observed at higher densities in the complex habitat structure composed of both live plants and thatch. However, the numerically dominant predator in the system, the wolf spider Pardosa milvina, was observed at high densities in habitat islands containing plastic mimics of plants and thatch. In a laboratory experiment, we examined the interactive effects of conspecific density and habitat on the prey capture of P. milvina. Thatch, with or without vertical plant structure, reduced prey capture, but the plastic fiber did not. Pairwise interactions among spiders reduced prey capture, but this effect was moderated by thatch. Taken together, these experiments highlight the flexibility of one important predator in the food web, where multiple environmental cues intersect to explain the role of habitat complexity in determining generalist predator accumulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20859749     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1785-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  22 in total

1.  Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades.

Authors:  Deborah L Finke; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Cannibalism, food limitation, intraspecific competition, and the regulation of spider populations.

Authors:  David H Wise
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 3.  Habitat structure affects intraguild predation.

Authors:  Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis; Sara Magalhães; Marta Montserrat; Tessa van der Hammen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 4.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-11

5.  Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities.

Authors:  Deborah L Finke; William E Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Predators avoiding predation.

Authors:  Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data.

Authors:  Paul A Murtaugh
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Non-webbuilding spiders: prey specialists or generalists?

Authors:  Wolfgang Nentwig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Abundance and community structure of forest floor spiders following litter manipulation.

Authors:  Thomas L Bultman; George W Uetz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Seasonal shift from bottom-up to top-down impact in phytophagous insect populations.

Authors:  Claudio Gratton; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  10 in total

1.  Information from familiar and related conspecifics affects foraging in a solitary wolf spider.

Authors:  Catherine R Hoffman; Michael I Sitvarin; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Body size mediates the relationship between spider (Arachnida: Araneae) assemblage composition and prey consumption rate: results of a mesocosm experiment in the Yukon, Canada.

Authors:  Shaun Turney; Chris M Buddle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Does fear beget fear? Risk-mediated habitat selection triggers predator avoidance at lower trophic levels.

Authors:  Carmen K Blubaugh; Ivy V Widick; Ian Kaplan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Distribution and oviposition site selection by predatory mites in the presence of intraguild predators.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Predator interference alters foraging behavior of a generalist predatory arthropod.

Authors:  Jason M Schmidt; Thomas O Crist; Kerri Wrinn; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Different hunting strategies of generalist predators result in functional differences.

Authors:  Radek Michalko; Stano Pekár
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Plant genetic identity of foundation tree species and their hybrids affects a litter-dwelling generalist predator.

Authors:  Todd Wojtowicz; Zacchaeus G Compson; Louis J Lamit; Thomas G Whitham; Catherine A Gehring
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Habitat productivity constrains the distribution of social spiders across continents - case study of the genus Stegodyphus.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Jens-Christian Svenning; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Outburst of pest populations in rice-based cropping systems under conservation agricultural practices in the middle Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Jaipal Singh Choudhary; Janki Sharan Mishra; Surajit Mondal; Shishpal Poonia; Mohammad Monobrullah; Hansraj Hans; Mausam Verma; Ujjwal Kumar; Bhagwati Prasad Bhatt; Ram Kanwar Malik; Virender Kumar; Andrew McDonald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Are temperate canopy spiders tree-species specific?

Authors:  Anne-Christine Mupepele; Tobias Müller; Marcus Dittrich; Andreas Floren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.