Literature DB >> 30725372

Body size mediates the relationship between spider (Arachnida: Araneae) assemblage composition and prey consumption rate: results of a mesocosm experiment in the Yukon, Canada.

Shaun Turney1, Chris M Buddle2.   

Abstract

Many ecological assemblages are undergoing rapid changes in composition and diversity, and changes at one trophic level can have direct and cascading effects on other trophic levels. Prey consumption typically increases with predator diversity due to niche complementarity and sampling effects. However, the effect of functional traits and interactions between predator species mean that the relationship is far from simple. In July 2016, we performed a series of experiments in the Yukon, Canada, to investigate the relationship between spider assemblage composition and prey consumption, with a focus on the wolf spider Pardosa lapponica (Thorell 1872). We carried out feeding trials, in which P. lapponica and other spider species were offered potential prey, as well as mesocosm experiments, in which we varied spider assemblage composition within small enclosures. We confirmed that P. lapponica is a generalist consumer, individual consumption rate increased with spider body size, and that intraguild predation is present. We found that prey consumption was greatest in the least diverse assemblage but consumption did increase with predator functional trait variation and biomass. The best model of prey consumption included predator assemblage composition, variation in body mass, biomass, and all interactions. The body size of a spider affects its trophic niche, energy requirements, and its interactions with other spiders. As a result, body size mediates the relationship between spider assemblage composition and prey consumption. A deeper understanding of the relationships between traits and functions will allow us to better predict the effect of species loss or gain on ecosystem functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthropod; Community; Ecosystem function; Predator; Tundra

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30725372     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04346-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  26 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  M Loreau; S Naeem; P Inchausti; J Bengtsson; J P Grime; A Hector; D U Hooper; M A Huston; D Raffaelli; B Schmid; D Tilman; D A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.

Authors:  Stuart H M Butchart; Matt Walpole; Ben Collen; Arco van Strien; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Rosamunde E A Almond; Jonathan E M Baillie; Bastian Bomhard; Claire Brown; John Bruno; Kent E Carpenter; Geneviève M Carr; Janice Chanson; Anna M Chenery; Jorge Csirke; Nick C Davidson; Frank Dentener; Matt Foster; Alessandro Galli; James N Galloway; Piero Genovesi; Richard D Gregory; Marc Hockings; Valerie Kapos; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Fiona Leverington; Jonathan Loh; Melodie A McGeoch; Louise McRae; Anahit Minasyan; Monica Hernández Morcillo; Thomasina E E Oldfield; Daniel Pauly; Suhel Quader; Carmen Revenga; John R Sauer; Benjamin Skolnik; Dian Spear; Damon Stanwell-Smith; Simon N Stuart; Andy Symes; Megan Tierney; Tristan D Tyrrell; Jean-Christophe Vié; Reg Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world.

Authors:  Vincent Devictor; David Mouillot; Christine Meynard; Frédéric Jiguet; Wilfried Thuiller; Nicolas Mouquet
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward.

Authors:  Owen L Petchey; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Predator diversity and trophic interactions.

Authors:  Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity.

Authors:  J Emmett Duffy; Bradley J Cardinale; Kristin E France; Peter B McIntyre; Elisa Thébault; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Climate change and sexual size dimorphism in an Arctic spider.

Authors:  Toke Thomas Høye; Jörg U Hammel; Thomas Fuchs; Søren Toft
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 8.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 9.  Trophic downgrading of planet Earth.

Authors:  James A Estes; John Terborgh; Justin S Brashares; Mary E Power; Joel Berger; William J Bond; Stephen R Carpenter; Timothy E Essington; Robert D Holt; Jeremy B C Jackson; Robert J Marquis; Lauri Oksanen; Tarja Oksanen; Robert T Paine; Ellen K Pikitch; William J Ripple; Stuart A Sandin; Marten Scheffer; Thomas W Schoener; Jonathan B Shurin; Anthony R E Sinclair; Michael E Soulé; Risto Virtanen; David A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Opportunistic predator prefers habitat complexity that exposes prey while reducing cannibalism and intraguild encounters.

Authors:  Jason M Schmidt; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.