Literature DB >> 28730345

Does fear beget fear? Risk-mediated habitat selection triggers predator avoidance at lower trophic levels.

Carmen K Blubaugh1,2, Ivy V Widick3, Ian Kaplan4.   

Abstract

Non-consumptive effects (NCEs) of predators are ubiquitous in food webs with well-detailed impacts on trophic cascades over multiple levels. However, integrating NCEs with other predator-mediated interactions, like intraguild predation, as well as context-specific habitat factors that shape top-down pressure, remains a challenge. Focusing on two common seed predators, mice (Peromyscus spp.) and carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), we quantify trophic and behavioral consequences of predation risk and availability of refuge vegetation on both intraguild predators (mice) and intraguild prey (beetles). In a 2-year field experiment, we manipulated refuge habitat (red clover), small mammal access, and moonlight, which small mammals use as an indirect cue of predation risk. We found that avoidance of predation risk by mice in simulated moonlight reduced carabid activity density in vegetation by up to 50% compared to exposed habitat, but had no cascading effects on seed predation. We linked patterns observed in the field with behavioral mechanisms by observing beetle foraging activity, and found that exposure to both indirect and direct vertebrate predator cues reduced movement by 50%, consistent with predator-mediated activity reductions observed in the field. However, predation risk increased carabid seed consumption by 43%. Thus, weak effects of predation risk on seed removal in the field may be explained by overcompensatory seed feeding by beetles. This work demonstrates that predators elicit responses that cascade over multiple trophic levels, triggering behavioral changes in species lower on the food chain. These behavior-mediated cascades are controlled by their spatiotemporal context and have important downstream impacts on predator-prey dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coleoptera: Carabidae; Intraguild predation; Non-consumptive effects; Peromyscus spp; Refuge; Seed predation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28730345     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3909-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

1.  Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades.

Authors:  Deborah L Finke; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Small-mammal seed predation limits the recruitment and abundance of two perennial grassland forbs.

Authors:  Mary Bricker; Dean Pearson; John Maron
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Compensatory mechanisms for ameliorating the fundamental trade-off between predator avoidance and foraging.

Authors:  Jennifer S Thaler; Scott H McArt; Ian Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Habitat structure affects intraguild predation.

Authors:  Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis; Sara Magalhães; Marta Montserrat; Tessa van der Hammen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity.

Authors:  E E Werner; B R Anholt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions.

Authors:  G A Polis; R D Holt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Nonconsumptive effects of a predator weaken then rebound over time.

Authors:  David L Kimbro; Jonathan H Grabowski; A Randall Hughes; Michael F Piehler; J Wilson White
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Diverse trait-mediated interactions in a multi-predator, multi-prey community.

Authors:  Renée P Prasad; William E Snyder
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Opportunistic predator prefers habitat complexity that exposes prey while reducing cannibalism and intraguild encounters.

Authors:  Jason M Schmidt; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Integration of multiple cues allows threat-sensitive anti-intraguild predator responses in predatory mites.

Authors:  Andreas Walzer; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.991

View more
  1 in total

1.  Connected Carabids: Network Interactions and Their Impact on Biocontrol by Carabid Beetles.

Authors:  Stefanie E De Heij; Christian J Willenborg
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 8.589

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.