Literature DB >> 20858833

Optimization of kVp and mAs for pediatric low-dose simulated abdominal CT: is it best to base parameter selection on object circumference?

Janet Reid1, Jessica Gamberoni, Frank Dong, William Davros.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the effect of mAs and kVp reduction on pediatric phantoms based on patient circumference to optimize dose reduction and maintain image quality for abdominal CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three polymethylmethacrylate right cylindric CT dose index (CTDI) phantoms with diameters of 10, 16, and 32 cm simulated the abdomen of an infant, child, and adolescent, respectively. Using a National Institute of Standards & Technology ion chamber and Victoreen 660 electrometer, doses at centerline were recorded on a 16-MDCT scanner. Measurements were obtained in incremental steps from 50 to 400 mAs and from 80 to 140 kVp. Noise was calibrated to clinical images through a calibration factor.
RESULTS: For phantoms of all circumferences, doses increased linearly with an increase in mAs and by the power function of kVp(n) for increases in kVp. There was an associated decrease in noise for all circumferences and a sharp decrease at lower doses with a plateau at higher doses. Using a noise threshold of 20 HU and a dose threshold of 2.5 cGy, a range of imaging parameters was established for each circumference from which technique optimization curves were created to determine optimal mAs and kVp pairs. The mean measured dose was 2.435 ± 0.019 cGy. The mean measured noise was 29.35 ± 1.45 HU.
CONCLUSION: For pediatric CT, the most accurate way to strike the balance between image quality and radiation dose is to adjust dose to abdominal circumference, not body weight or age. Our data support the use of technique optimization curves to optimize kVp and mAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20858833     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  17 in total

1.  Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in multidetector CT of large body size adults.

Authors:  Gaurav S Desai; Raul N Uppot; Elaine W Yu; Avinash R Kambadakone; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The impact of pediatric-specific dose modulation curves on radiation dose and image quality in head computed tomography.

Authors:  Joana Santos; Shane Foley; Graciano Paulo; Mark F McEntee; Louise Rainford
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-05

3.  The feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of the pediatric abdomen by dual-source CT.

Authors:  Eray Atlı; Erhan Akpınar; Emre Ünal; Berna Oğuz Sayan; Mithat Haliloğlu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Can a revised paediatric radiation dose reduction CT protocol be applied and still maintain anatomical delineation, diagnostic confidence and overall imaging quality?

Authors:  S Kritsaneepaiboon; P Siriwanarangsun; P Tanaanantarak; A Krisanachinda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Development of pediatric CT protocols for specific scanners: why bother?

Authors:  Dianna D Cody
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

Review 6.  Small Bowel Imaging: an Update.

Authors:  Jordi Rimola; Julián Panés
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-07

Review 7.  Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Dorothy Bulas; Priscilla F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Steven Don; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Manrita Sidhu; Keith J Strauss; S Ted Treves
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

8.  Statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems. Part III. Task-based kV/mAs optimization for radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Ke Li; Daniel Gomez-Cardona; Jiang Hsieh; Meghan G Lubner; Perry J Pickhardt; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Comparison of image quality between 70 kVp and 80 kVp: application to paediatric cardiac CT.

Authors:  Sébastien Durand; Jean-François Paul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.