BACKGROUND: To explore the activity of lapatinib with a novel trial design focused on the drug target rather than on histology. METHODS:Patients with HER2 amplified gastro-esophageal, bladder, ovarian, or uterine tumors were enrolled into a double-blinded randomized discontinuation study of lapatinib 1,500 mg PO daily. The planned sample size was 250 patients with HER2 amplified tumors, with the goal of randomizing 100 patients with stable disease (SD) at week 12 to eitherlapatinib or placebo. Patients responding after 12 weeks continued on lapatinib; those who progressed were discontinued from study. The primary objectives were response rate after 12 weeks and the percentage of patients who remained progression free 12 weeks after randomization to placebo versus lapatinib. Secondary objectives were duration of response and determination of the incidence of HER2 amplification in multiple tumor types. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were screened and 32 patients with HER2 amplified tumors were enrolled. At week 12, 1 (3%) patient had a complete response, 9 (28%) had stable disease, 20 (63%) had progressive disease, and 2 (6%) were unknown. Only 7 patients with SD underwent randomization. The low response rate coupled with slow screening and enrollment led to early study closure. CONCLUSIONS: Basing trial eligibility on the presence of a genetic target, versus histologic classification, is challenging. While HER2 amplifications appear to be prevalent in select non-breast tumors, lapatinib monotherapy is associated with modest activity. The target-specific histology-independent randomized discontinuation design still merits consideration for targets clearly implicated in "oncogene addiction".
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To explore the activity of lapatinib with a novel trial design focused on the drug target rather than on histology. METHODS:Patients with HER2 amplified gastro-esophageal, bladder, ovarian, or uterine tumors were enrolled into a double-blinded randomized discontinuation study of lapatinib 1,500 mg PO daily. The planned sample size was 250 patients with HER2 amplified tumors, with the goal of randomizing 100 patients with stable disease (SD) at week 12 to either lapatinib or placebo. Patients responding after 12 weeks continued on lapatinib; those who progressed were discontinued from study. The primary objectives were response rate after 12 weeks and the percentage of patients who remained progression free 12 weeks after randomization to placebo versus lapatinib. Secondary objectives were duration of response and determination of the incidence of HER2 amplification in multiple tumor types. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were screened and 32 patients with HER2 amplified tumors were enrolled. At week 12, 1 (3%) patient had a complete response, 9 (28%) had stable disease, 20 (63%) had progressive disease, and 2 (6%) were unknown. Only 7 patients with SD underwent randomization. The low response rate coupled with slow screening and enrollment led to early study closure. CONCLUSIONS: Basing trial eligibility on the presence of a genetic target, versus histologic classification, is challenging. While HER2 amplifications appear to be prevalent in select non-breast tumors, lapatinib monotherapy is associated with modest activity. The target-specific histology-independent randomized discontinuation design still merits consideration for targets clearly implicated in "oncogene addiction".
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Michael S Gordon; Daniela Matei; Carol Aghajanian; Ursula A Matulonis; Molly Brewer; Gini F Fleming; John D Hainsworth; Agustin A Garcia; Mark D Pegram; Russell J Schilder; David E Cohn; Lynda Roman; Mika K Derynck; Kimmie Ng; Benjamin Lyons; David E Allison; David A Eberhard; Thinh Q Pham; Randall C Dere; Beth Y Karlan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ingo K Mellinghoff; Maria Y Wang; Igor Vivanco; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Shaojun Zhu; Ederlyn Q Dia; Kan V Lu; Koji Yoshimoto; Julie H Y Huang; Dennis J Chute; Bridget L Riggs; Steve Horvath; Linda M Liau; Webster K Cavenee; P Nagesh Rao; Rameen Beroukhim; Timothy C Peck; Jeffrey C Lee; William R Sellers; David Stokoe; Michael Prados; Timothy F Cloughesy; Charles L Sawyers; Paul S Mischel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Simon; A Nocito; T Hübscher; C Bucher; J Torhorst; P Schraml; L Bubendorf; M M Mihatsch; H Moch; K Wilber; A Schötzau; J Kononen; G Sauter Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-08-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dmytro M Havaleshko; Steven Christopher Smith; HyungJun Cho; Sooyoung Cheon; Charles R Owens; Jae K Lee; Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina; Julia D Wulfkuhle; Emanuel F Petricoin; Dan Theodorescu Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Christian Wülfing; Jean-Pascal H Machiels; Dirk J Richel; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Uwe Treiber; Marco R De Groot; Philippe Beuzeboc; Roma Parikh; Frank Pétavy; Iman A El-Hariry Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David Cameron; Michelle Casey; Michael Press; Deborah Lindquist; Tadeusz Pienkowski; C Gilles Romieu; Stephen Chan; Agnieszka Jagiello-Gruszfeld; Bella Kaufman; John Crown; Arlene Chan; Mario Campone; Patrice Viens; Neville Davidson; Vera Gorbounova; Johannes Isaac Raats; Dimosthenis Skarlos; Beth Newstat; Debasish Roychowdhury; Paolo Paoletti; Cristina Oliva; Stephen Rubin; Steven Stein; Charles E Geyer Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-01-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Filip Janku; David S Hong; Siqing Fu; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Aung Naing; Gerald S Falchook; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Vanda M Stepanek; Stacy L Moulder; J Jack Lee; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Ralph G Zinner; Russell R Broaddus; Jennifer J Wheler; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Michael Luis; Ana Tavares; Liliana S Carvalho; Lúcio Lara-Santos; António Araújo; Ramon Andrade de Mello Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Jolijn W Groeneweg; Silvia F Hernandez; Virginia F Byron; Celeste M DiGloria; Hector Lopez; Vanessa Scialabba; Minji Kim; Ling Zhang; Darrell R Borger; Rosemary Tambouret; Rosemary Foster; Bo R Rueda; Whitfield B Growdon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jo Morrison; Clemens Thoma; Richard J Goodall; Thomas J Lyons; Kezia Gaitskell; Alison J Wiggans; Andrew Bryant Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-16