Literature DB >> 19399906

A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase 2 study of lapatinib as the second-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma.

Christian Wülfing1, Jean-Pascal H Machiels, Dirk J Richel, Marc-Oliver Grimm, Uwe Treiber, Marco R De Groot, Philippe Beuzeboc, Roma Parikh, Frank Pétavy, Iman A El-Hariry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of recurrent transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) remains an unmet clinical need. This study assessed lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER-2, as second-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TCC.
METHODS: This was a single-arm, multicenter, open-label, prospective phase 2 study. Patients with TCC whose disease progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy received lapatinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with evaluations for response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria performed every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint of the current study was objective tumor response rate. Secondary endpoints included safety, time to disease progression, and overall survival.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, 25 of whom (42%) could not be evaluated for response. The primary endpoint of an objective response rate (ORR) >10% was observed in 1.7% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.0%-9.1%) of patients; however, 18 (31%; 95% CI, 19%-44%) patients achieved stable disease (SD). The median time to disease progression and overall survival (OS) were 8.6 weeks (95% CI, 8.0 weeks-11.3 weeks) and 17.9 weeks (95% CI, 13.1 weeks-30.3 weeks), respectively. Clinical benefit (ORR and SD) was found to be correlated with EGFR overexpression (P = .029), and, to some extent, HER-2 overexpression. The median OS was significantly prolonged in patients with tumors that overexpressed EGFR and/or HER-2 (P = .0001). Lapatinib was well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: The study was considered to be negative because it did not meet its primary endpoint; however, further analysis demonstrated an improvement in OS in a subset of patients with tumors overexpressing EGFR and/or HER-2, which is encouraging and warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19399906     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  71 in total

Review 1.  [Update on chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Update 2010].

Authors:  M M Heck; J E Gschwend; M Retz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: an update on systemic therapy.

Authors:  Hayley Knollman; J Luke Godwin; Rishi Jain; Yu-Ning Wong; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel M Geynisman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Monalisa Ghosh; Sam J Brancato; Piyush K Agarwal; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 4.  The role of EGFR family inhibitors in muscle invasive bladder cancer: a review of clinical data and molecular evidence.

Authors:  Benjamin A Mooso; Ruth L Vinall; Maria Mudryj; Stanley A Yap; Ralph W deVere White; Paramita M Ghosh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Elevating the Horizon: Emerging Molecular and Genomic Targets in the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Metin Kurtoglu; Nicole N Davarpanah; Rui Qin; Thomas Powles; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  Emerging personalized approaches for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Che-Kai Tsao; Benjamin A Gartrell; William K Oh; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.512

7.  A randomized phase 2 trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin with or without cetuximab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Stephanie Daignault; Neeraj Agarwal; Petros D Grivas; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Igor Puzanov; Gary R MacVicar; Ellis Glenn Levine; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Mario A Eisenberger; David I Quinn; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Evan Y Yu; Scott Dawsey; Kathleen C Day; Mark L Day; Mahmoud Al-Hawary; David C Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Assessing HER2 gene amplification as a potential target for therapy in invasive urothelial bladder cancer with a standardized methodology: results in 1005 patients.

Authors:  M Laé; J Couturier; S Oudard; F Radvanyi; P Beuzeboc; A Vieillefond
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Targeting molecular aberrations in urothelial carcinoma: are we almost there?

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; David J Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2013

10.  Comparison of global versus epidermal growth factor receptor pathway profiling for prediction of lapatinib sensitivity in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dmytro M Havaleshko; Steven Christopher Smith; HyungJun Cho; Sooyoung Cheon; Charles R Owens; Jae K Lee; Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina; Julia D Wulfkuhle; Emanuel F Petricoin; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.