Literature DB >> 19881954

Comparison of global versus epidermal growth factor receptor pathway profiling for prediction of lapatinib sensitivity in bladder cancer.

Dmytro M Havaleshko1, Steven Christopher Smith, HyungJun Cho, Sooyoung Cheon, Charles R Owens, Jae K Lee, Lance A Liotta, Virginia Espina, Julia D Wulfkuhle, Emanuel F Petricoin, Dan Theodorescu.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer is rarely curative. The recently developed small molecule, lapatinib, a dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, might improve this situation. Recent findings suggest that identifying which patients are likely to benefit from targeted therapies is beneficial, although controversy remains regarding what types of evaluation might yield optimal candidate biomarkers of sensitivity. Here, we address this issue by developing and comparing lapatinib sensitivity prediction models for human bladder cancer cells. After empirically determining in vitro sensitivities (drug concentration necessary to cause a 50% growth inhibition) of a panel of 39 such lines to lapatinib treatment, we developed prediction models based on profiling the baseline transcriptome, the phosphorylation status of EGFR pathway signaling targets, or a combination of both data sets. We observed that models derived from microarray gene expression data showed better prediction performance (93%-98% accuracy) compared with models derived from EGFR pathway profiling of 23 selected phosphoproteins known to be involved in EGFR-driven signaling (54%-61% accuracy) or from a subset of the microarray data for transcripts in the EGFR pathway (86% accuracy). Combining microarray data and phosphoprotein profiling provided a combination model with 98% accuracy. Our findings suggest that transcriptome-wide profiling for biomarkers of lapatinib sensitivity in cancer cells provides models with excellent predictive performance and may be effectively combined with EGFR pathway phosphoprotein profiling data. These results have significant implications for the use of such tools in personalizing the approach to cancers treated with EGFR-directed targeted therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19881954      PMCID: PMC2767220          DOI: 10.1593/neo.09898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  61 in total

1.  Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data.

Authors:  Rafael A Irizarry; Benjamin M Bolstad; Francois Collin; Leslie M Cope; Bridget Hobbs; Terence P Speed
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Functional genomic comparison of lineage-related human bladder cancer cell lines with differing tumorigenic and metastatic potentials by spectral karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, and a novel method of positional expression profiling.

Authors:  Michael A Harding; Karen C Arden; James W Gildea; John J Gildea; Elizabeth J Perlman; Carrie Viars; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Local-pooled-error test for identifying differentially expressed genes with a small number of replicated microarrays.

Authors:  Nitin Jain; Jayant Thatte; Thomas Braciale; Klaus Ley; Michael O'Connell; Jae K Lee
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Expression profiles of ErbB family receptors and prognosis in primary transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  N H Chow; S H Chan; T S Tzai; C L Ho; H S Liu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Bladder cancer: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Chris Leo Pashos; Marc F Botteman; Benjamin Lewis Laskin; Alberto Redaelli
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  Gemcitabine/paclitaxel-based three-drug regimens in advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors:  J Bellmunt; V Guillem; L Paz-Ares; J L González-Larriba; J Carles; J Albanell; J M Tabernero; H Cortés-Funes; J Baselga
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  RhoGDI2 is an invasion and metastasis suppressor gene in human cancer.

Authors:  John J Gildea; M Jabed Seraj; Gary Oxford; Michael A Harding; Garret M Hampton; Christopher A Moskaluk; Henry F Frierson; Mark R Conaway; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  The role of Ral A in epidermal growth factor receptor-regulated cell motility.

Authors:  John J Gildea; Michael A Harding; M Jabed Seraj; Kay M Gulding; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Inhibitors of epidermal-growth-factor receptors: a review of clinical research with a focus on non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Srikala S Sridhar; Lesley Seymour; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Phase II study of predictive biomarker profiles for response targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) in advanced inflammatory breast cancer with lapatinib monotherapy.

Authors:  Stephen Johnston; Maureen Trudeau; Bella Kaufman; Hamouda Boussen; Kimberley Blackwell; Patricia LoRusso; Donald P Lombardi; Slim Ben Ahmed; Dennis L Citrin; Michelle L DeSilvio; Jennifer Harris; Ron E Westlund; Vanessa Salazar; Tal Z Zaks; Neil L Spector
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  14 in total

1.  The interconnectedness of cancer cell signaling.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Reverse phase protein microarrays advance to use in clinical trials.

Authors:  Claudius Mueller; Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Evidence for PTEN-independent Akt activation and Akt-independent p27(Kip1) expression in advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  J Mundhenk; J Hennenlotter; L Zug; S H Alloussi; T Todenhoefer; G Gakis; S Aufderklamm; M Scharpf; U Kuehs; A Stenzl; C Schwentner
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Microarray-integrated optoelectrofluidic immunoassay system.

Authors:  Dongsik Han; Je-Kyun Park
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Dinosaurs and ancient civilizations: reflections on the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 6.  Biomarkers for bladder cancer management: present and future.

Authors:  Fei Ye; Li Wang; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Russell McBride; Matthew D Galsky; Jun Zhu; Paolo Boffetta; David Y Zhang; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-04-05

7.  Urothelial carcinomas: a focus on human epidermal receptors signaling.

Authors:  Petros D Grivas; Mark Day; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 4.060

8.  Target-specific, histology-independent, randomized discontinuation study of lapatinib in patients with HER2-amplified solid tumors.

Authors:  Matthew D Galsky; Daniel D Von Hoff; Marcus Neubauer; Thomas Anderson; Mark Fleming; Yasir Nagarwala; Janine M Mahoney; Dawn Midwinter; Linda Vocila; Tal Z Zaks
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  The War on Cancer rages on.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  A pilot characterization of human lung NSCLC by protein pathway activation mapping.

Authors:  Angela Zupa; Giuseppina Improta; Alessandra Silvestri; Elisa Pin; Jianghong Deng; Michele Aieta; Pellegrino Musto; Donato Nitti; Enzo Mammano; Lance Liotta; Claudio Belluco; Julia Wulfkuhle; Emanuel Petricoin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 15.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.