AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical facial soft tissue measurements with the measurements of facial plaster cast, three-dimensional scanned facial plaster cast, 3-dimensional digital photogrammetrical images, and three-dimensional laser scanner images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional facial images of 15 adults were obtained with stereophotogrammetry and a three-dimensional laser scanner. Facial models of subjects were obtained using silicone impression and were scanned. Landmarks were marked on the subjects and plaster casts, digitized on three-dimensional models, and measured in Mimics 12.0 software (Materialise's Interactive Medical Image Control System, Leuven, Belgium). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between all three-dimensional measurement methods in mouth width, philtrum median height, and nasal width. Comparison of clinical measurements with facial plaster cast measurements revealed that philtral width, nasal tip protrusion, and right lip and nostril heights were wider and longer in clinical measurements than in facial plaster cast measurements. Comparison of clinical measurements to the laser scanned and stereophotogrammetric model measurements revealed that philtrum lateral and lip heights and philtral width were significantly different between methods. When laser scanned and stereophotogrammetric measurements were compared, significant differences were observed in lip and nostril heights. CONCLUSIONS: Facial impression may be problematic owing to the depression caused by the impression material especially on the tip of the nose. Laser scanning is not sensitive enough to visualize the deeper indentations such as nostrils. Stereophotogrammetry is promising for three-dimensional facial measurements and even will be better when color identification between mucocutaneous junctions of the lip region is achieved.
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical facial soft tissue measurements with the measurements of facial plaster cast, three-dimensional scanned facial plaster cast, 3-dimensional digital photogrammetrical images, and three-dimensional laser scanner images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional facial images of 15 adults were obtained with stereophotogrammetry and a three-dimensional laser scanner. Facial models of subjects were obtained using silicone impression and were scanned. Landmarks were marked on the subjects and plaster casts, digitized on three-dimensional models, and measured in Mimics 12.0 software (Materialise's Interactive Medical Image Control System, Leuven, Belgium). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between all three-dimensional measurement methods in mouth width, philtrum median height, and nasal width. Comparison of clinical measurements with facial plaster cast measurements revealed that philtral width, nasal tip protrusion, and right lip and nostril heights were wider and longer in clinical measurements than in facial plaster cast measurements. Comparison of clinical measurements to the laser scanned and stereophotogrammetric model measurements revealed that philtrum lateral and lip heights and philtral width were significantly different between methods. When laser scanned and stereophotogrammetric measurements were compared, significant differences were observed in lip and nostril heights. CONCLUSIONS: Facial impression may be problematic owing to the depression caused by the impression material especially on the tip of the nose. Laser scanning is not sensitive enough to visualize the deeper indentations such as nostrils. Stereophotogrammetry is promising for three-dimensional facial measurements and even will be better when color identification between mucocutaneous junctions of the lip region is achieved.
Authors: Zhenqi Zhao; Lizhe Xie; Dan Cao; Iman Izadikhah; Pengcheng Gao; Yang Zhao; Bin Yan Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 2.419