Literature DB >> 30206567

Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics.

Oya Erten1, Burcu Nur Yılmaz1.   

Abstract

Orthodontic records are one of the main milestones in orthodontic therapy. Records are essential not only for diagnosis and treatment planning but also for follow-up of the case, communicating with colleagues, and evaluating the treatment outcomes. Recently, two-dimensional (2D) imaging technology, such as cephalometric and panoramic radiographs and photographs, and plaster models were routinely used. However, after the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) technologies (laser scanner, stereophotogrammetry, and computed tomography) into dentistry, 3D imaging systems are more and more commonly preferred than 2D, especially in cases with craniofacial deformities. In fact, 3D imaging provided more detailed and realistic diagnostic information about the craniofacial hard as well as soft tissue and allowed to perform easier, faster, and more reliable 3D analyses. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the 3D imaging techniques, including their advantages and disadvantages, and to outline the indications for 3D imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Three-dimensional; computed tomography; imaging; laser scanner; orthodontics; stereophotogrammetry

Year:  2018        PMID: 30206567      PMCID: PMC6124883          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  48 in total

Review 1.  Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review.

Authors:  Joanneke M Plooij; Thomas J J Maal; Piet Haers; Wilfred A Borstlap; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Stefaan J Bergé
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Rahime Burcu Nur; Derya Germeç Çakan; Tülin Arun
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 3.  Systematic literature review of digital three-dimensional superimposition techniques to create virtual dental patients.

Authors:  Tim Joda; Urs Brägger; German Gallucci
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system.

Authors:  Chung How Kau; Stephen Richmond; Alexei I Zhurov; Jeremy Knox; Ivor Chestnutt; Frank Hartles; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Alveolar bone morphology in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate in the mixed dentition: cone beam computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  Daniela Gamba Garib; Marília Sayako Yatabe; Terumi Okada Ozawa; Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-07-08

6.  Three-dimensional facial growth studied by optical surface scanning.

Authors:  S J Nute; J P Moss
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2000-03

7.  Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.

Authors:  Susanna Botticelli; Carlalberta Verna; Paolo M Cattaneo; Jens Heidmann; Birte Melsen
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Completing the 3-dimensional picture.

Authors:  Christopher Lane; William Harrell
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 9.  Three-dimensional imaging methods for quantitative analysis of facial soft tissues and skeletal morphology in patients with orofacial clefts: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mette A R Kuijpers; Yu-Ting Chiu; Rania M Nada; Carine E L Carels; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review.

Authors:  Orhan Hakki Karatas; Ebubekir Toy
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  [Deep learning-assisted construction of three-demensional facial midsagittal plane].

Authors:  Y J Zhu; Q Xu; Y J Zhao; L Zhang; Z W Fu; A N Wen; Z X Gao; J Zhang; X L Fu; Y Wang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-02-18

2.  Evaluation of two stereophotogrametry software for 3D reconstruction of virtual facial models.

Authors:  Lorena Basilio Chaves; Taliane Lima Barbosa; Caroline Pelagio Maués Casagrande; David Silveira Alencar; Jonas Capelli; Felipe de Assis Ribeiro Carvalho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Reliability of Photogrammetric Landmarks to the Conventional Cephalogram for Analyzing Soft-Tissue Landmarks in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Pragya Jaiswal; Aniruddha Gandhi; Abhinav Raj Gupta; Nidhi Malik; Sanjay Kumar Singh; Kumar Ramesh
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  Integration of imaging modalities in digital dental workflows - possibilities, limitations, and potential future developments.

Authors:  Sohaib Shujaat; Michael M Bornstein; Jeffery B Price; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement.

Authors:  Yin Cheng Lim; Ameerah Su'ad Abdul Shakor; Rafiza Shaharudin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-25

6.  Use of Facial Morphology to Determine Nutritional Status in Older Adults: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Wesley Tay; Rina Quek; Bhupinder Kaur; Joseph Lim; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2022-07-18

7.  Accuracy of three-dimensional photogrammetry and cone beam computed tomography based on linear measurements in patients with facial deformities.

Authors:  Zhenqi Zhao; Lizhe Xie; Dan Cao; Iman Izadikhah; Pengcheng Gao; Yang Zhao; Bin Yan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.419

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.