Literature DB >> 25492502

Colorectal cancer screening quality, cost and practice in an era of healthcare transformation.

Martin Brotman1.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening is the largest single source of income for gastroenterologists in the USA. Despite its proven value in preventing colon cancer, it is being scrutinized by payers and regulators as a high-volume procedure with variable quality, cost and documentation. In a rapidly evolving era of reimbursement for added value (high quality, affordable cost) rather than for individual transactions/volume, gastroenterologists are under pressure to change our practices to respond to the demands of the marketplace. Excellent guidance is available through our professional societies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25492502     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3447-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  18 in total

Review 1.  The road ahead: what if gastroenterologists were accountable for preventing colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Tzuyung D Kou; Jill S Barnholtz Sloan; Siran M Koroukian; Mark D Schluchter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Engaging doctors in the health care revolution.

Authors:  Thomas H Lee; Toby Cosgrove
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2014-06

4.  The efficacy of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Anil K Rustgi; Ronald J Vender; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 5.  Clinical decision support for colon and rectal surgery: an overview.

Authors:  Allison B McCoy; Genevieve B Melton; Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

Review 6.  DNA testing and molecular screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 7.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'Brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Shawn S Forbes; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David F Ransohoff; Steven H Itzkowitz; Theodore R Levin; Philip Lavin; Graham P Lidgard; David A Ahlquist; Barry M Berger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid Increase the Risk of Renal Impairment Compared to 4 L Polyethylene Glycol?

Authors:  Sang Pyo Lee; Eugene Park; Han Viet Kim; In-Kyung Sung; Jeong Hwan Kim; Sun-Young Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.