Literature DB >> 20854008

Task effects on eye movements during reading.

Johanna K Kaakinen1, Jukka Hyönä.   

Abstract

The present study examined how proofreading and reading-for-comprehension instructions influence eye movements during reading. Thirty-seven participants silently read sentences containing compound words as target words while their eye movements were being recorded. We manipulated word length and frequency to examine how task instructions influence orthographic versus lexical-semantic processing during reading. Task instructions influenced both temporal and spatial aspects of eye movements: The initial landing position in words was shifted leftward, the saccade length was shorter, first fixation and gaze duration were longer, and refixation probability was higher during proofreading than during reading for comprehension. Moreover, in comparison to instructions for reading for comprehension, proofreading instructions increased both orthographic and lexical-semantic processing. This became apparent in a greater word length and word frequency effect in gaze duration during proofreading than during reading for comprehension. The present study suggests that the allocation of attentional resources during reading is significantly modulated by task demands. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20854008     DOI: 10.1037/a0020693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  19 in total

1.  Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of Landolt-C stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task.

Authors:  Mengsi Wang; Hazel I Blythe; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The emergence of frequency effects in eye movements.

Authors:  Polina M Vanyukov; Tessa Warren; Mark E Wheeler; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-01-20

4.  Evidence for a global oculomotor program in reading.

Authors:  Noor Al-Zanoon; Michael Dambacher; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-07-11

5.  Reconsidering Yarbus: a failure to predict observers' task from eye movement patterns.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Tommy Liu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Revisiting the self-generation effect in proofreading.

Authors:  Alexander P Burgoyne; Sari Saba-Sadiya; Lauren Julius Harris; Mark W Becker; Jan W Brascamp; David Z Hambrick
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  The impact of hyperlinks, skim reading and perceived importance when reading on the Web.

Authors:  Lewis T Jayes; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Mark J Weal; Johanna K Kaakinen; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell; Ian Howard; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-14

9.  Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words.

Authors:  Patrick Bonin; Betty Laroche; Alain Méot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-08

10.  Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

Authors:  Lijing Chen; Xingshan Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.