Literature DB >> 34036537

Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of Landolt-C stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task.

Mengsi Wang1, Hazel I Blythe2, Simon P Liversedge3.   

Abstract

We examined whether typical frequency effects observed in normal reading would also occur in a target search task using non-linguistic Landolt-C stimuli. In an initial learning session, we simulated development of frequency effects by controlling exposures participants received of Landolt-C clusters during learning. In a subsequent scanning session, we manipulated the cluster demarcation form of linear strings of Landolt-C clusters (i.e., spaced vs. unspaced vs. shaded unspaced). Participants were required to scan and search for pre-learnt target clusters that were embedded in longer Landolt-C strings. During learning, frequency effects were successfully simulated such that targets with more exposures received shorter fixation time than those with fewer exposures. Participants were unable to successfully detect the pre-learnt targets when they were embedded in the strings during scanning. No evidence of frequency effects was observed in the scanning session. In contrast, eye-movement control was significantly influenced by cluster demarcation form, with increased difficulty for unspaced strings, less for shaded strings, and least for spaced strings. Furthermore, typical landing position distributions that occur in reading of spaced languages also occurred during scanning of spaced Landolt-C strings but not for the shaded or the unspaced strings. In conclusion, exposure frequency effects were successfully simulated during learning but did not carry over to target search during scanning of Landolt-C strings. Possible reasons why frequency effects did not occur in the scanning session are discussed.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster demarcation; Exposure frequency; Landolt-C; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34036537     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02321-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Task effects on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Johanna K Kaakinen; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Space information is important for reading.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Joana Acha
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control.

Authors:  K Rayner; M H Fischer; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults.

Authors:  Chuanli Zang; Feifei Liang; Xuejun Bai; Guoli Yan; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.332

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.