| Literature DB >> 20849612 |
Maija E Rossi1, Eeva Jason, Silvia Marchesotti, Prasun Dastidar, Jyrki Ollikainen, Seppo Soimakallio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both a large lesion volume and abnormalities in diffusion tensor imaging are independently associated with a poor prognosis after cerebral infarctions. Therefore, we assume that they are associated. This study assessed the associations between lesion volumes and diffusion tensor imaging in patients with a right-sided cerebral infarction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20849612 PMCID: PMC2954947 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-10-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Figure 1Infarction lesion. The right-hemispheric lesion area and the corresponding contralateral area (a) in diffusion images with regions of interest marked in red. The corresponding lesion is shown in an apparent diffusion coefficient map (b). The high-signal infarction area is situated at the junction of the external capsule and the caudate nucleus.
Figure 2Examples of region of interest setting. (a) Region of interest setting in the cerebral peduncle (red); (b) the knee of the internal capsule (red) and the thalamus (blue).
Figure 3Software for volumetric analysis. The user interface of Anatomatic™ 2.23 software was used in the volumetric analysis. The figure on the left represents the original axial CT slice depicting a large temporal lobe infarction. The figure on the right represents the accurately segmented area of infarction.
Patient characteristics and lesion volumes
| Sex | Age | TT | Location | Acute volume (mL) | Chronic volume (mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | 57 | No | MCA, lower dorsal temporal lobe | 0.00 | 2.48 |
| M | 73 | No | MCA and ACA, peri callosum | 2.92 | 21.45 |
| M | 66 | No | MCA, dorsal frontal lobe and temporal lobe | 7.71 | 70.46 |
| F | 57 | No | MCA, upper temporal lobe | 0.00 | 9.44 |
| M | 75 | No | PCA, temporal occipital lobe | 2.98 | 26.46 |
| M | 64 | No | MCA, corona radiata | 0.26 | 1.88 |
| M | 59 | Yes | MCA, corona radiata | 0.05 | 0.82 |
| M | 71 | No | MCA, corona radiata, capsula externa | 1.25 | 8.84 |
| M | 56 | No | PCA, temporal occipital lobe, thalamus, corona radiata | 2.19 | 51.12 |
| M | 46 | No | MCA, corona radiata | 0.35 | 1.34 |
| M | 59 | Yes | PCA, occipital lobe | 0.69 | 3.73 |
| M | 73 | No | MCA, nucleus lentiformis | 0.23 | 4.5 |
| M | 69 | No | MCA, temporal lobe | 0.33 | 84.96 |
| M | 55 | Yes | PCA, occipital lobe | 3.46 | 10.9 |
| M | 62 | No | MCA, dorsal temporal lobe | 1.87 | 27.31 |
| M | 70 | Yes | MCA, corona radiata, capsula externa | 0.09 | 0.82 |
| M | 64 | No | MCA, temporal lobe | 2.36 | 80.7 |
| M | 55 | Yes | MCA, upper temporal lobe | 1.49 | 15.99 |
| F | 77 | Yes | MCA, corona radiata | 0.02 | 0.54 |
| M | 66 | No | Watershed, frontal lobe, frontoparietal border | 0.25 | 2.85 |
| M | 78 | No | Watershed, dorsal frontal lobe and parietal lobe | 0.00 | 2.71 |
| F | 62 | No | MCA, temporal lobe | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| F | 62 | Yes | MCA, corona radiata, capsula externa | 0.22 | 1.18 |
| M | 73 | No | MCA, corona radiata | 0.48 | 1.67 |
| M | 62 | No | MCA, corona radiata, capsula interna | 0.36 | 0.89 |
| M | 78 | No | MCA, corona radiata | 0.35 | 0.57 |
| F | 79 | No | MCA, temporal lobe | 13.55 | 102.96 |
| M | 72 | Yes | MCA, upper dorsal temporal lobe | 4.05 | 37.06 |
| F | 75 | No | MCA, corona radiata, capsula interna | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| M | 52 | No | MCA, corona radiata, capsula interna, nucleus caudatus, nucleus lentiformis | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| F | 73 | Yes | MCA, temporal lobe | 2.15 | 14.06 |
| M | 75 | Yes | PCA, cortical infarction | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| M | 58 | No | MCA, corona radiata, putamen, capsula externa; PCA, deep white matter | 8.5 | 15.34 |
TT, Thrombolytic Therapy; MCA, Middle Cerebral Artery; ACA, Anterior Cerebral Artery; PCA, Posterior Cerebral Artery.
Figure 4Tractography in the lesion area. Example tractography images of trackts completely destroyed after infarction in two different angles (a, b) and the corresponding ADC map in a 64-year-old male patient. The missing fiber trackts are indicated with arrows.
DTI data
| Infarct side (right side) | Unaffected side (left side) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Median | Mean (SD) | Median | p-value* | |
| FA | |||||
| Infarct/undamaged contralateral area | 0.17 (0.09) | 0.16 | 0.42 (0.18) | 0.43 | < 0.001 |
| Internal capsule genu | 0.69 (0.11) | 0.70 | 0.72 (0.07) | 0.73 | 0.014 |
| Thalamus | 0.33 (0.06) | 0.32 | 0.32 (0.04) | 0.32 | 0.381 |
| Cerebral peduncle | 0.75 (0.08) | 0.75 | 0.79 (0.06) | 0.79 | 0.003 |
| Centrum semiovale | 0.56 (0.09) | 0.58 | 0.60 (0.09) | 0.62 | 0.012 |
| Infarct/undamaged contralateral area | 1.79 (0.55) | 1.63 | 0.80 (0.14) | 0.76 | < 0.001 |
| Internal capsule genu | 0.72 (0.07) | 0.72 | 0.69 (0.05) | 0.70 | 0.021 |
| Thalamus | 0.87 (0.18) | 0.82 | 0.77 (0.06) | 0.76 | < 0.001 |
| Cerebral peduncle | 0.74 (0.07) | 0.74 | 0.70 (0.05) | 0.69 | 0.002 |
| Centrum semiovale | 0.72 (0.05) | 0.72 | 0.70 (0.05) | 0.69 | 0.007 |
Mean values, standard deviations (SD) and medians of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) (× 10-3mm2s-1) scores in different regions in diffusion tensor imaging analysis.
* The difference between the right and left sides, Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Figure 5Association between acute lesion volume and MD. Correlation between acute-stage lesion volume and mean diffusivity within the lesion (black) and the corresponding contralateral area (grey) with 95% confidence intervals.
Correlation between volume and DTI
| Acute lesion volume | Chronic lesion volume | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | MD | FA | MD | |
| Corpus callosum rostrum | -0.179 (0.318) | 0.236 (0.185) | -0.297 (0.093) | 0.264 (0.138) |
| Corpus callosum truncus | -0.173 (0.337) | 0.190 (0.290) | -0.290 (0.101) | 0.262 (0.141) |
| Corpus callosum splenium | -0.138 (0.444) | 0.053 (0.770) | 0.227 (0.204) | |
| Infarct | -0.274 (0.123) | 0.352 (0.045) | ||
| Cerebral peduncle | -0.139 (0.439) | -0.194 (0.281) | ||
| Thalamus | -0.327 (0.063) | 0.361 (0.039) | -0.307 (0.083) | 0.349 (0.047) |
| Internal capsule genu | -0.291 (0.100) | |||
| Centrum semiovale | -0.197 (0.272) | |||
| Corresponding area of infarction | -0.129 (0.474) | 0.274 (0.122) | ||
| Cerebral peduncle | 0.059 (0.745) | 0.361 (0.039) | 0.091 (0.614) | 0.184 (0.305) |
| Thalamus | -0.376 (0.031) | 0.176 (0.327) | -0.298 (0.092) | 0.045 (0.803) |
| Internal capsule genu | 0.351 (0.045) | -0.131 (0.468) | 0.168 (0.351) | |
| Centrum semiovale | 0.030 (0.870) | 0.001 (0.997) | 0.154 (0.391) | -0.041 (0.819) |
Spearman's correlation between the infarct volume and the fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) (× 10-3mm2s-1) values in different regions.
Numbers in parentheses are the p-values. Statistically significant results that survived the Bonferroni correction are highlighted in bold.
Figure 6Correlation between chronic lesion volume and MMSE. Correlation between chronic-stage lesion volume and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) with 95% confidence interval. Patients are divided into older (black) and younger (grey) than 65 years.