Literature DB >> 12215588

CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in randomized order: diffusion-weighted imaging results in higher accuracy and lower interrater variability in the diagnosis of hyperacute ischemic stroke.

J B Fiebach1, P D Schellinger, O Jansen, M Meyer, P Wilde, J Bender, P Schramm, E Jüttler, J Oehler, M Hartmann, S Hähnel, M Knauth, W Hacke, K Sartor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) has become a commonly used imaging modality in stroke centers. The value of this method as a routine procedure is still being discussed. In previous studies, CT was always performed before DWI. Therefore, infarct progression could be a reason for the better result in DWI.
METHODS: All hyperacute (<6 hours) stroke patients admitted to our emergency department with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >3 were prospectively randomized for the order in which CT and MRI were performed. Five stroke experts and 4 residents blinded to clinical data judged stroke signs and lesion size on the images. To determine the interrater variability, we calculated kappa values for both rating groups.
RESULTS: A total of 50 patients with ischemic stroke and 4 patients with transient symptoms of acute stroke (median NIHSS score, 11; range, 3 to 27) were analyzed. Of the 50 patients, 55% were examined with DWI first. The mean delay from symptom onset until CT was 180 minutes; that from symptom onset until DWI was 189 minutes. The mean delay between DWI and CT was 30 minutes. The sensitivity of infarct detection by the experts was significantly better when based on DWI (CT/DWI, 61/91%). Accuracy was 91% when based on DWI (CT, 61%). Interrater variability of lesion detection was also significantly better for DWI (CT/DWI, kappa=0.51/0.84). The assessment of lesion extent was less homogeneous on CT (CT/DWI, kappa=0.38/0.62). The differences between the 2 modalities were stronger in the residents' ratings (CT/DWI: sensitivity, 46/81%; kappa=0.38/0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: CT and DWI performed with the same delay after onset of ischemic stroke resulted in significant differences in diagnostic accuracy. DWI gives good interrater homogeneity and has a substantially better sensitivity and accuracy than CT even if the raters have limited experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215588     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000026864.20339.cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  110 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging of cerebral ischemia and infarction.

Authors:  Carlos Leiva-Salinas; Max Wintermark; Chelsea S Kidwell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  CT versus MR for acute stroke imaging: is the "obvious" choice necessarily the correct one?

Authors:  Michael H Lev
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Cerebral perfusion impairment correlates with the decrease of CT density in acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Thomas Kucinski; Amitava Majumder; René Knab; Dirk Naumann; Jens Fiehler; Ole Väterlein; Bernd Eckert; Joachim Röther; Hermann Zeumer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Hyperacute stroke: experience essential when reading unenhanced CT scans.

Authors:  J H Warwick Pexman; Michael D Hill; Alastair M Buchan; Andrew M Demchuk; Philip A Barber; Jessica E Simon; Shelagh B Coutts
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Diagnosis of stroke on neuroimaging.

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; A J Farrall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-20

Review 6.  Stroke wars: episode IV CT strikes back.

Authors:  Robert D Zimmerman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Imaging of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Carlos Leiva-Salinas; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  CT Density Changes with Rapid Onset Acute, Severe, Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Monkeys.

Authors:  Edwin M Nemoto; Oscar Mendez; Mary E Kerr; Andrew Firlik; Kevin Stevenson; Tudor Jovin; Howard Yonas
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  An institutional review of hospital resource utilization and patient radiation exposure in shunted idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Tyler Cho; Daniel Kreatsoulas; Joel Fritz; John M McGregor; Douglas A Hardesty
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 10.  Computed tomography in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Karl-Olof Lövblad; Alison E Baird
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.