Literature DB >> 20848188

Does proximity to coal-fired power plants influence fish tissue mercury?

Dana K Sackett1, D Derek Aday, James A Rice, W Gregory Cope, David Buchwalter.   

Abstract

Much of the mercury contamination in aquatic biota originates from coal-fired power plants, point sources that release mercury into the atmosphere. Understanding mercury dynamics is primarily important because of the toxic threat mercury poses to wildlife and humans through the consumption of contaminated fish. In this study, we quantified the relative importance of proximity to coal-fired power plants on mercury accumulation in two fish species of different trophic positions. Fish, water and sediment were collected and analyzed from 14 lakes, seven near to (<10 km) and seven far from (>30 km) coal-fired power plants. Lower tissue mercury and higher tissue selenium concentrations were measured in fish collected near power plants. Moreover, mercury accumulation in fish was driven by biotic characteristics (e.g., trophic position, total length, age), waterbody characteristics (e.g., pH, dissolved organic carbon and sulfate) and distance from power plants. Proximity to an atmospheric point-source of mercury and selenium, such as a coal-fired power plant, affects the quantities of mercury and selenium accumulated in fish tissue. Differences in accumulation are hypothesized to be driven in part by selenium-mitigated reductions in fish tissue mercury near power plants. Although reduced fish tissue mercury in systems near power plants may decrease mercury-specific risks to human consumers, these benefits are highly localized and the relatively high selenium associated with these tissues may compromise ecological health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20848188     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-010-0545-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  24 in total

1.  Patterns of Hg bioaccumulation and transfer in aquatic food webs across multi-lake studies in the northeast US.

Authors:  Celia Y Chen; Richard S Stemberger; Neil C Kamman; Brandon M Mayes; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Sources of mercury wet deposition in Eastern Ohio, USA.

Authors:  Gerald J Keeler; Matthew S Landis; Gary A Norris; Emily M Christianson; J Timothy Dvonch
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Re-examination of the determination of environmental nitrate as nitrite by reduction with hydrazine.

Authors:  A J Kempers; A G Luft
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  Mercury, fish oils, and risk of acute coronary events and cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality in men in eastern Finland.

Authors:  Jyrki K Virtanen; Sari Voutilainen; Tiina H Rissanen; Jaakko Mursu; Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen; Maarit J Korhonen; Veli-Pekka Valkonen; Kari Seppänen; Jari A Laukkanen; Jukka T Salonen
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 8.311

5.  Elimination of mercury by yellow perch in the wild.

Authors:  Jillian L A Van Walleghem; Paul J Blanchfield; Holger Hintelmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Mercury-selenium compounds and their toxicological significance: toward a molecular understanding of the mercury-selenium antagonism.

Authors:  Mohammad A K Khan; Feiyue Wang
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 7.  Mercury-induced reproductive impairment in fish.

Authors:  Kate L Crump; Vance L Trudeau
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of mercury in striped bass (Morone saxatilis) and tautog (Tautoga onitis) from the Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, USA).

Authors:  Maria N Piraino; David L Taylor
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.130

Review 9.  Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter--a review.

Authors:  Mahalingam Ravichandran
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 10.  The three modern faces of mercury.

Authors:  Thomas W Clarkson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Relating fish health and reproductive metrics to contaminant bioaccumulation at the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill site.

Authors:  Brenda M Pracheil; S Marshall Adams; Mark S Bevelhimer; Allison M Fortner; Mark S Greeley; Cheryl A Murphy; Teresa J Mathews; Mark J Peterson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Metal contamination of river otters in North Carolina.

Authors:  Charles W Sanders; Krishna Pacifici; George R Hess; Colleen Olfenbuttel; Christopher S DePerno
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The influence of external subsidies on diet, growth and Hg concentrations of freshwater sport fish: implications for management and fish consumption advisories.

Authors:  Jesse M Lepak; Mevin B Hooten; Brett M Johnson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Contrasting food web factor and body size relationships with Hg and Se concentrations in marine biota.

Authors:  Roxanne Karimi; Michael Frisk; Nicholas S Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Selenium, Mercury, and Their Molar Ratio in Sportfish from Drinking Water Reservoirs.

Authors:  Tara K B Johnson; Catherine E LePrevost; Thomas J Kwak; W Gregory Cope
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The influence of fish length on tissue mercury dynamics: implications for natural resource management and human health risk.

Authors:  Dana K Sackett; W Gregory Cope; James A Rice; D Derek Aday
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.