Literature DB >> 17051773

Sources of mercury wet deposition in Eastern Ohio, USA.

Gerald J Keeler1, Matthew S Landis, Gary A Norris, Emily M Christianson, J Timothy Dvonch.   

Abstract

In the fall of 2002, an enhanced air monitoring site was established in Steubenville, Ohio as part of a multi-year comprehensive mercury monitoring and source apportionment study to investigate the impact of local and regional coal combustion sources on atmospheric mercury deposition in the Ohio River Valley. This study deployed advanced monitoring instrumentation, utilized innovative analytical techniques, and applied state-of-the-art statistical receptor models. This paper presents wet deposition data and source apportionment modeling results from daily event precipitation samples collected during the calendar years 2003-2004. The volume-weighted mean mercury concentrations for 2003 and 2004 were 14.0 and 13.5 ng L(-1), respectively, and total annual mercury wet deposition was 13.5 and 19.7 microg m(-2), respectively. Two new EPA-implemented multivariate statistical models, positive matrix factorization (PMF) and Unmix, were applied to the data set and six sources were identified. The dominant contributor to the mercury wet deposition was found by both models to be coal combustion (approximately 70%). Meteorological analysis also indicated that a majority of the mercury deposition found at the Steubenville site was due to local and regional sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17051773     DOI: 10.1021/es060377q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  14 in total

1.  Local deposition of mercury in topsoils around coal-fired power plants: is it always true?

Authors:  José Antonio Rodriguez Martin; Nikos Nanos; Theodoros Grigoratos; Gregoria Carbonell; Constantini Samara
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Wet deposition flux and runoff output flux of mercury in a typical small agricultural watershed in Three Gorges Reservoir areas.

Authors:  Zheng Zhao; Dingyong Wang; Ya Wang; Zhijian Mu; Jinshan Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Distribution and health risk assessment of mercury in urban street dust from coal energy dominant Huainan City, China.

Authors:  Liugen Zheng; Quan Tang; Jiamin Fan; Xiaoyu Huang; Chunlu Jiang; Hua Cheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Fate and transport of mercury in environmental media and human exposure.

Authors:  Moon-Kyung Kim; Kyung-Duk Zoh
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-11-29

5.  Source Attribution for Mercury Deposition with an Updated Atmospheric Mercury Emission Inventory in the Pearl River Delta Region, China.

Authors:  Jiajun Liu; Long Wang; Yun Zhu; Che-Jen Lin; Carey Jang; Shuxiao Wang; Jia Xing; Bin Yu; Hui Xu; Yuzhou Pan
Journal:  Front Environ Sci Eng       Date:  2018

6.  Spatial gradients of methylmercury for breeding common loons in the Laurentian Great Lakes region.

Authors:  David C Evers; Kathryn A Williams; Michael W Meyer; Anton M Scheuhammer; Nina Schoch; Andrew T Gilbert; Lori Siegel; Robert J Taylor; Robert Poppenga; Christopher R Perkins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Does proximity to coal-fired power plants influence fish tissue mercury?

Authors:  Dana K Sackett; D Derek Aday; James A Rice; W Gregory Cope; David Buchwalter
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Mercury concentrations in wetlands associated with coal-fired power plants.

Authors:  Scott M Weir; Richard S Halbrook; Donald W Sparling
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Insights into the mercury(II) adsorption and binding mechanism onto several typical soils in China.

Authors:  Xiuhong Ding; Renqing Wang; Yuncong Li; Yandong Gan; Shuwei Liu; Jiulan Dai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Mercury bioaccumulation in Southern Appalachian birds, assessed through feather concentrations.

Authors:  Rebecca Hylton Keller; Lingtian Xie; David B Buchwalter; Kathleen E Franzreb; Theodore R Simons
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.