Literature DB >> 27154845

Relating fish health and reproductive metrics to contaminant bioaccumulation at the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill site.

Brenda M Pracheil1, S Marshall Adams2, Mark S Bevelhimer2, Allison M Fortner2, Mark S Greeley2, Cheryl A Murphy3, Teresa J Mathews2, Mark J Peterson2.   

Abstract

A 4.1 million m(3) coal ash release into the Emory and Clinch rivers in December 2008 at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant in east Tennessee, USA, prompted a long-term, large-scale biological monitoring effort to determine if there are chronic effects of this spill on resident biota. Because of the magnitude of the ash spill and the potential for exposure to coal ash-associated contaminants [e.g., selenium (Se), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg)] which are bioaccumulative and may present human and ecological risks, an integrative, bioindicator approach was used. Three species of fish were monitored-bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), redear sunfish (L. microlophus), and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)-at ash-affected and reference sites annually for 5 years following the spill. On the same individual fish, contaminant burdens were measured in various tissues, blood chemistry parameters as metrics of fish health, and various condition and reproduction indices. A multivariate statistical approach was then used to evaluate relationships between contaminant bioaccumulation and fish metrics to assess the chronic, sub-lethal effects of exposure to the complex mixture of coal ash-associated contaminants at and around the ash spill site. This study suggests that while fish tissue concentrations of some ash-associated contaminants are elevated at the spill site, there was no consistent evidence of compromised fish health linked with the spill. Further, although relationships between elevated fillet burdens of ash-associated contaminants and some fish metrics were found, these relationships were not indicative of exposure to coal ash or spill sites. The present study adds to the weight of evidence from prior studies suggesting that fish populations have not incurred significant biological effects from spilled ash at this site: findings that are relevant to the current national discussions on the safe disposal of coal ash waste.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Bioaccumulation; Coal-ash; Contaminant; Fish; Fish health; Mercury; Selenium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27154845     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-016-1668-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  26 in total

Review 1.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Survey of the potential environmental and health impacts in the immediate aftermath of the coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee.

Authors:  Laura Ruhl; Avner Vengosh; Gary S Dwyer; Heileen Hsu-Kim; Amrika Deonarine; Mike Bergin; Julia Kravchenko
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Teratogenic effects of selenium in natural populations of freshwater fish.

Authors:  A D Lemly
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.291

4.  Wildlife and the coal waste policy debate: proposed rules for coal waste disposal ignore lessons from 45 years of wildlife poisoning.

Authors:  A Dennis Lemly; Joseph P Skorupa
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  The use of tetragnathid spiders as bioindicators of metal exposure at a coal ash spill site.

Authors:  Ryan R Otter; Mary Hayden; Teresa Mathews; Allison Fortner; Frank C Bailey
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Does proximity to coal-fired power plants influence fish tissue mercury?

Authors:  Dana K Sackett; D Derek Aday; James A Rice; W Gregory Cope; David Buchwalter
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Effects of sediment containing coal ash from the Kingston ash release on embryo-larval development in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas (Rafinesque, 1820).

Authors:  Mark S Greeley; Logan R Elmore; Mary K McCracken; Rick M Sherrard
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Environmental impacts of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill. 2. Effect of coal ash on methylmercury in historically contaminated river sediments.

Authors:  Amrika Deonarine; Gideon Bartov; Thomas M Johnson; Laura Ruhl; Avner Vengosh; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Biotransference and biomagnification of selenium copper, cadmium, zinc, arsenic and lead in a temperate seagrass ecosystem from Lake Macquarie Estuary, NSW, Australia.

Authors:  M Barwick; W Maher
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.130

10.  Long-term effects of nanoscaled titanium dioxide on the cladoceran Daphnia magna over six generations.

Authors:  Claudia Jacobasch; Carolin Völker; Sabrina Giebner; Johannes Völker; Heiko Alsenz; Theodoros Potouridis; Heike Heidenreich; Gernot Kayser; Jörg Oehlmann; Matthias Oetken
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 8.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.