Literature DB >> 20451778

Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.

Manuel O Lagravère1, Corey Low, Carlos Flores-Mir, Raymund Chung, Jason P Carey, Giseon Heo, Paul W Major.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine and compare the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of commonly used cephalometric landmarks identified on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images.
METHODS: CBCT images from 10 randomly selected adolescent patients were obtained from the orthodontic records of a private practice. Measurement errors, and intraexaminer, and interexaminer reliability correlation coefficients (ICC) were obtained for all landmark coordinates.
RESULTS: Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities for all coordinates for most landmarks on the digital lateral cephalograms and CBCT images were greater than 0.9 (ICC value). The means of landmark locations differed by approximately 1 mm in most coordinates from the lateral cephalograms and were predominantly higher than 1 mm for all coordinates from the CBCT images.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities were high for most landmarks. Coordinates with greater measurement errors in the lateral cephalograms (condylion, gonion, porion, mandibular incisor apex, and posterior nasal spine) were in structures without clearly defined borders. In the CBCT images, gonion, condylion, and porion were located on surfaces that were flat or curved, making it difficult to recognize a specific reference point. Other less reliable landmarks (anterior nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, mandibular incisor apex) were located in structures with lower densities and could not be visualized with 3-dimensional reconstruction; thus, they had high measurement errors. Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20451778     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  31 in total

1.  3D cephalometric analysis obtained from computed tomography. Review of the literature.

Authors:  Giulia Rossini; Costanza Cavallini; Michele Cassetta; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-01-27

2.  Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  M O Lagravère; P W Major; J Carey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.

Authors:  Abhishek Gupta; Om Prakash Kharbanda; Viren Sardana; Rajiv Balachandran; Harish Kumar Sardana
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.

Authors:  R A Katkar; C Kummet; D Dawson; L Moreno Uribe; V Allareddy; M Finkelstein; A Ruprecht
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Adrienn Dobai; Tamás Vizkelety; Zsolt Markella; Adrienne Rosta; Ágnes Kucsera; József Barabás
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-03-23

6.  Concordance of traditional osteometric and volume-rendered MSCT interlandmark cranial measurements.

Authors:  Daniel Franklin; Andrea Cardini; Ambika Flavel; Algis Kuliukas; Murray K Marks; Rob Hart; Charles Oxnard; Paul O'Higgins
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Denise K Liberton; Payal Verma; Anthony Contratto; Janice S Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.

Authors:  Robert Y Wei; Arjun Atresh; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung Nguyen; Brent E Larson; Jonathan E Mangum; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Reliability of three-dimensional anterior cranial base superimposition methods for assessment of overall hard tissue changes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cecilia Ponce-Garcia; Manuel Lagravere-Vich; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos de Olivera Ruellas; Jason Carey; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.

Authors:  Alycia Sam; Kris Currie; Heesoo Oh; Carlos Flores-Mir; Manuel Lagravére-Vich
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.