Literature DB >> 12940557

The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.

Z Mirzen Arat1, Meliha Rübendüz, Ayça Arman Akgül.   

Abstract

In this study, the amount and direction of displacement of reference landmarks located on the cranial base and face were examined and compared according to the superimposition methods of Björk (method A), Steiner (method B), and Ricketts (method C). The material consisted of cephalometric and hand-wrist films of 40 nontreated growing individuals obtained at the beginning (T1) and at the end of the observation period (T2). Hand-wrist films were used to evaluate the skeletal maturation of the subjects. The displacement of each landmark was measured according to each superimposition method, and the amounts of displacement in each method were evaluated by paired t-test. The repeated measurement analysis of variance test was used to compare the variances of the changes among the methods. Significant changes were observed in landmarks (sella, nasion, basion, pterygomaxillare), which used as references for superimpositions. The direction of displacement of sella and pterygomaxillare points was different among the methods. In the horizontal plane, although most landmarks were displaced in a similar manner in the Björk and Ricketts methods, the vertical displacement of all the landmarks was different. The horizontal displacements of basion, condylion, and gonion were similar according to all three methods. These results indicate that differences regarding the superimposition methods should be taken into consideration in the evaluation of the changes due to growth or treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12940557     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0374:TDOCRL>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  11 in total

1.  Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  M O Lagravère; P W Major; J Carey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods.

Authors:  Amritraj Jabbal; Martyn Cobourne; Nora Donaldson; Dirk Bister
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class I Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Farhad Salmanpour
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-08-18

4.  Longitudinal growth changes of the cranial base from puberty to adulthood. A comparison of different superimposition methods.

Authors:  Zuleyha Mirzen Arat; Hakan Türkkahraman; Jeryl D English; Ronald L Gallerano; Jim C Boley
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effects of Type and Amount of Orthodontic Tooth Movement on Digital Model Superimposition Accuracy.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Farhad Salmanpour
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-12

6.  Evaluation of an automated superimposition method based on multiple landmarks for growing patients.

Authors:  Min-Gyu Kim; Jun-Ho Moon; Hye-Won Hwang; Sung Joo Cho; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ersin Yildirim; Seniz Karacay; Mustafa Erkan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.684

8.  Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.

Authors:  Jae Joon Hwang; Kee-Deog Kim; Hyok Park; Chang Seo Park; Ho-Gul Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relationship between cranial and mandibular growth and the stages of maturation of the cervical vertebrae.

Authors:  Melissa Feres Damian; Fernando Cechinato; Rafael Dagnese Molina; Fábio Eduardo Woitchunas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 10.  Craniofacial photographic superimposition: New developments.

Authors:  Douglas H Ubelaker; Yaohan Wu; Quinnlan R Cordero
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.