Literature DB >> 20837942

Evaluation of treatment-effect heterogeneity using biomarkers measured on a continuous scale: subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot.

Ann A Lazar1, Bernard F Cole, Marco Bonetti, Richard D Gelber.   

Abstract

The discovery of biomarkers that predict treatment effectiveness has great potential for improving medical care, particularly in oncology. These biomarkers are increasingly reported on a continuous scale, allowing investigators to explore how treatment efficacy varies as the biomarker values continuously increase, as opposed to using arbitrary categories of expression levels resulting in a loss of information. In the age of biomarkers as continuous predictors (eg, expression level percentage rather than positive v negative), alternatives to such dichotomized analyses are needed. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of an intuitive statistical approach-the subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP)-for evaluating treatment-effect heterogeneity when a biomarker is measured on a continuous scale. STEPP graphically explores the patterns of treatment effect across overlapping intervals of the biomarker values. As an example, STEPP methodology is used to explore patterns of treatment effect for varying levels of the biomarker Ki-67 in the BIG (Breast International Group) 1-98 randomized clinical trial comparing letrozole with tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. STEPP analyses showed patients with higher Ki-67 values who were assigned to receive tamoxifen had the poorest prognosis and may benefit most from letrozole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20837942      PMCID: PMC2988642          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.9182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

1.  The utility of mitotic index, oestrogen receptor and Ki-67 measurements in the creation of novel prognostic indices for node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  P C Clahsen; C J van de Velde; C Duval; C Pallud; A M Mandard; A Delobelle-Deroide; L van den Broek; M J van de Vijver
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  A new approach to modelling interactions between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Willi Sauerbrei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Forest plots and the interpretation of subgroups.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation.

Authors:  J Gerdes; U Schwab; H Lemke; H Stein
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1983-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  Predicting response to systemic treatments: learning from the past to plan for the future.

Authors:  Meredith M Regan; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Beat Thürlimann; Aparna Keshaviah; Alan S Coates; Henning Mouridsen; Louis Mauriac; John F Forbes; Robert Paridaens; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Richard D Gelber; Manuela Rabaglio; Ian Smith; Andrew Wardley; Andrew Wardly; Karen N Price; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials.

Authors:  Marco Bonetti; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Should aromatase inhibitors be used as initial adjuvant treatment or sequenced after tamoxifen?

Authors:  J Cuzick; P Sasieni; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  37 in total

1.  Differential efficacy of three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and ER-negative tumors: long-term follow up on IBCSG Trial IX.

Authors:  S Aebi; Z Sun; D Braun; K N Price; M Castiglione-Gertsch; M Rabaglio; R D Gelber; D Crivellari; J Lindtner; R Snyder; P Karlsson; E Simoncini; B A Gusterson; G Viale; M M Regan; A S Coates; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in sequence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical trial at 8·1 years median follow-up.

Authors:  Meredith M Regan; Patrick Neven; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Aron Goldhirsch; Bent Ejlertsen; Louis Mauriac; John F Forbes; Ian Smith; István Láng; Andrew Wardley; Manuela Rabaglio; Karen N Price; Richard D Gelber; Alan S Coates; Beat Thürlimann
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Phase 3 Assessment of the Automated Bone Scan Index as a Prognostic Imaging Biomarker of Overall Survival in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Armstrong; Aseem Anand; Lars Edenbrandt; Eva Bondesson; Anders Bjartell; Anders Widmark; Cora N Sternberg; Roberto Pili; Helen Tuvesson; Örjan Nordle; Michael A Carducci; Michael J Morris
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Clinical trials in the era of personalized oncology.

Authors:  Michael L Maitland; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  The Fundamental Difficulty With Evaluating the Accuracy of Biomarkers for Guiding Treatment.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe; Lisa M McShane; Daniel J Sargent; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of letrozole plus oral temsirolimus as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; Ann A Lazar; Igor Bondarenko; August M Garin; Stephen Brincat; Louis Chow; Yan Sun; Zora Neskovic-Konstantinovic; Rodrigo C Guimaraes; Pierre Fumoleau; Arlene Chan; Soulef Hachemi; Andrew Strahs; Maria Cincotta; Anna Berkenblit; Mizue Krygowski; Lih Lisa Kang; Laurence Moore; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Evaluation of biomarkers for treatment selection using individual participant data from multiple clinical trials.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Holly Janes; Parvin Tajik; Henk Groen; Ben Mol; Corine Koopmans; Kim Broekhuijsen; Eva Zwertbroek; Maria van Pampus; Maureen Franssen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Predicting benefit of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Meredith M Regan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Obesity and risk of recurrence or death after adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole or tamoxifen in the breast international group 1-98 trial.

Authors:  Marianne Ewertz; Kathryn P Gray; Meredith M Regan; Bent Ejlertsen; Karen N Price; Beat Thürlimann; Hervé Bonnefoi; John F Forbes; Robert J Paridaens; Manuela Rabaglio; Richard D Gelber; Marco Colleoni; István Láng; Ian E Smith; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Henning T Mouridsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis for continuous, binary, and count outcomes.

Authors:  Wai-Ki Yip; Marco Bonetti; Bernard F Cole; William Barcella; Xin Victoria Wang; Ann Lazar; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.