Literature DB >> 29444553

Evaluation of biomarkers for treatment selection using individual participant data from multiple clinical trials.

Chaeryon Kang1, Holly Janes2, Parvin Tajik3,4, Henk Groen5, Ben Mol6, Corine Koopmans7, Kim Broekhuijsen7, Eva Zwertbroek5, Maria van Pampus8, Maureen Franssen7.   

Abstract

Biomarkers that predict treatment effects may be used to guide treatment decisions, thus improving patient outcomes. A meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) is potentially more powerful than a single-study data analysis in evaluating markers for treatment selection. Our study was motivated by the IPD that were collected from 2 randomized controlled trials of hypertension and preeclampsia among pregnant women to evaluate the effect of labor induction over expectant management of the pregnancy in preventing progression to severe maternal disease. The existing literature on statistical methods for biomarker evaluation in IPD meta-analysis have evaluated a marker's performance in terms of its ability to predict risk of disease outcome, which do not directly apply to the treatment selection problem. In this study, we propose a statistical framework for evaluating a marker for treatment selection given IPD from a small number of individual clinical trials. We derive marker-based treatment rules by minimizing the average expected outcome across studies. The application of the proposed methods to the IPD from 2 studies in women with hypertension in pregnancy is presented.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HYPITAT trials; individual participant data; randomized clinical trial; treatment selection biomarker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29444553      PMCID: PMC5889758          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  45 in total

1.  A multivariate test of interaction for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  D A Follmann; M A Proschan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1995-10-31       Impact factor: 4.239

3.  Commentary: like it and lump it? Meta-analysis using individual participant data.

Authors:  Richard D Riley
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 4.  Uses and abuses of tumor markers in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-06

5.  How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.

Authors:  Michael Zlowodzki; Rudolf W Poolman; Gino M Kerkhoffs; Paul Tornetta; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head.

Authors:  Jesse A Berlin; Jill Santanna; Christopher H Schmid; Lynda A Szczech; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Immediate delivery versus expectant monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation (HYPITAT-II): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kim Broekhuijsen; Gert-Jan van Baaren; Maria G van Pampus; Wessel Ganzevoort; J Marko Sikkema; Mallory D Woiski; Martijn A Oudijk; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Henk A Bremer; Robbert J P Rijnders; Aren J van Loon; Denise A M Perquin; Jan M J Sporken; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Marloes E van Huizen; Corla B Vredevoogd; Jozien T J Brons; Mesrure Kaplan; Anton H van Kaam; Henk Groen; Martina M Porath; Paul P van den Berg; Ben W J Mol; Maureen T M Franssen; Josje Langenveld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Eric Laber
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2012-01-01

9.  An approach to evaluating and comparing biomarkers for patient treatment selection.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Marshall D Brown; Ying Huang; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.