Literature DB >> 27094489

Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis for continuous, binary, and count outcomes.

Wai-Ki Yip1, Marco Bonetti2, Bernard F Cole3, William Barcella4, Xin Victoria Wang5, Ann Lazar6, Richard D Gelber5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For the past few decades, randomized clinical trials have provided evidence for effective treatments by comparing several competing therapies. Their successes have led to numerous new therapies to combat many diseases. However, since their conclusions are based on the entire cohort in the trial, the treatment recommendation is for everyone, and may not be the best option for an individual. Medical research is now focusing more on providing personalized care for patients, which requires investigating how patient characteristics, including novel biomarkers, modify the effect of current treatment modalities. This is known as heterogeneity of treatment effects. A better understanding of the interaction between treatment and patient-specific prognostic factors will enable practitioners to expand the availability of tailored therapies, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes. The Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) approach was developed to allow researchers to investigate the heterogeneity of treatment effects on survival outcomes across values of a (continuously measured) covariate, such as a biomarker measurement.
METHODS: Here, we extend the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot approach to continuous, binary, and count outcomes, which can be easily modeled using generalized linear models. With this extension of Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot, these additional types of treatment effects within subpopulations defined with respect to a covariate of interest can be estimated, and the statistical significance of any observed heterogeneity of treatment effect can be assessed using permutation tests. The desirable feature that commonly used models are applied to well-defined patient subgroups to estimate treatment effects is retained in this extension.
RESULTS: We describe a simulation study to confirm that the proper Type I error rate is maintained when there is no treatment heterogeneity, and a power study to show that the statistics have power to detect treatment heterogeneity under alternative scenarios. As an illustration, we apply the methods to data from the Aspirin/Folate Polyp Prevention Study, a clinical trial evaluating the effect of oral aspirin, folic acid, or both as a chemoprevention agent against colorectal adenomas. The pre-existing R software package stepp has been extended to handle continuous, binary, and count data using Gaussian, Bernoulli, and Poisson models, and it is available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network.
CONCLUSION: The extension of the method and the availability of new software now permit STEPP to be applied to the full range of clinical trial end points.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Generalized linear model; Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP); randomized clinical trial; subgroup analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27094489      PMCID: PMC4942365          DOI: 10.1177/1740774516643297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  15 in total

1.  Detecting treatment-by-centre interaction in multi-centre clinical trials.

Authors:  R F Potthoff; B L Peterson; S L George
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A graphical method to assess treatment-covariate interactions using the Cox model on subsets of the data.

Authors:  M Bonetti; R D Gelber
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A new approach to modelling interactions between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Willi Sauerbrei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  John A Baron; Bernard F Cole; Robert S Sandler; Robert W Haile; Dennis Ahnen; Robert Bresalier; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Robert W Summers; Richard Rothstein; Carol A Burke; Dale C Snover; Timothy R Church; John I Allen; Michael Beach; Gerald J Beck; John H Bond; Tim Byers; E Robert Greenberg; Jack S Mandel; Norman Marcon; Leila A Mott; Loretta Pearson; Fred Saibil; Rosalind U van Stolk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Evaluation of treatment-effect heterogeneity using biomarkers measured on a continuous scale: subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot.

Authors:  Ann A Lazar; Bernard F Cole; Marco Bonetti; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials.

Authors:  Marco Bonetti; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Predicting degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in NSABP trial B-31.

Authors:  Katherine L Pogue-Geile; Chungyeul Kim; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Noriko Tanaka; Hanna Bandos; Patrick G Gavin; Debora Fumagalli; Lynn C Goldstein; Nour Sneige; Eike Burandt; Yusuke Taniyama; Olga L Bohn; Ahwon Lee; Seung-Il Kim; Megan L Reilly; Matthew Y Remillard; Nicole L Blackmon; Seong-Rim Kim; Zachary D Horne; Priya Rastogi; Louis Fehrenbacher; Edward H Romond; Sandra M Swain; Eleftherios P Mamounas; D Lawrence Wickerham; Charles E Geyer; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Identifying treatment effect heterogeneity in clinical trials using subpopulations of events: STEPP.

Authors:  Ann A Lazar; Marco Bonetti; Bernard F Cole; Wai-Ki Yip; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a joint analysis of two randomised trials investigating three versus six courses of CMF.

Authors:  M Colleoni; H J Litman; M Castiglione-Gertsch; W Sauerbrei; R D Gelber; M Bonetti; A S Coates; M Schumacher; G Bastert; C-M Rudenstam; C Schmoor; J Lindtner; J Collins; B Thürlimann; S B Holmberg; D Crivellari; C Beyerle; R L A Neumann; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Association of Somatic Driver Alterations With Prognosis in Postmenopausal, Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BIG 1-98 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stephen J Luen; Rebecca Asher; Chee Khoon Lee; Peter Savas; Roswitha Kammler; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Olivia Maria Biasi; David Demanse; Lellean JeBailey; Sinead Dolan; Wolfgang Hackl; Beat Thuerlimann; Giuseppe Viale; Marco Colleoni; Meredith M Regan; Sherene Loi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Differential effects of an electronic symptom monitoring intervention based on the age of patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  R D Nipp; N K Horick; A M Deal; L J Rogak; C Fuh; J A Greer; A C Dueck; E Basch; J S Temel; A El-Jawahri
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  TMEM213 as a novel prognostic and predictive biomarker for patients with lung adenocarcinoma after curative resection: a study based on bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Jiayun Zou; Zhi Li; Hao Deng; Junli Hao; Rui Ding; Mingfang Zhao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  High Response Rate and Durability Driven by HLA Genetic Diversity in Patients with Kidney Cancer Treated with Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab.

Authors:  Chung-Han Lee; Renzo G DiNatale; Diego Chowell; Chirag Krishna; Vladimir Makarov; Cristina Valero; Lynda Vuong; Mark Lee; Kate Weiss; Doug Hoen; Luc Morris; Ed Reznik; Samuel Murray; Ritesh Kotecha; Martin H Voss; Maria I Carlo; Darren Feldman; Pallavi Sachdev; Yusuke Adachi; Yukinori Minoshima; Junji Matsui; Yasuhiro Funahashi; Kenichi Nomoto; A Ari Hakimi; Robert J Motzer; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  Prognostic and predictive value of androgen receptor expression in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from the Breast International Group Trial 1-98.

Authors:  Kevin H Kensler; Meredith M Regan; Yujing J Heng; Gabrielle M Baker; Michael E Pyle; Stuart J Schnitt; Aditi Hazra; Roswitha Kammler; Beat Thürlimann; Marco Colleoni; Giuseppe Viale; Myles Brown; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  The Value of Phenotypes in Knee Osteoarthritis Research.

Authors:  Fred R T Nelson
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-03-16

7.  Renal function and the effects of vericiguat in patients with worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: insights from the VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with HFrEF) trial.

Authors:  Adriaan A Voors; Hillary Mulder; Eugene Reyes; Martin R Cowie; Johan Lassus; Adrian F Hernandez; Justin A Ezekowitz; Javed Butler; Christopher M O'Connor; Joerg Koglin; Carolyn S P Lam; Burkert Pieske; Lothar Roessig; Piotr Ponikowski; Kevin J Anstrom; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 15.534

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.