Literature DB >> 20837835

Patient perceptions of mistakes in ambulatory care.

Christine E Kistler1, Louise C Walter, C Madeline Mitchell, Philip D Sloane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little information exists about current patient perceptions of medical mistakes in ambulatory care within a diverse population. We aimed to learn about the perceptions of medical mistakes, what factors were associated with perceived mistakes, and whether the participants changed physicians because of these perceived mistakes.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey at 7 primary care practices in North Carolina of English- or Spanish-speaking adults, aged 18 years and older, who saw a health care professional during 2008. Main outcome measures were 4 questions about patient perceptions of medical mistakes in the ambulatory care setting, including (1) overall experience with a medical mistake; type of mistake, such as a (2) diagnostic mistake or (3) treatment mistake, and its associated harm; and (4) effect of this mistake on changing physicians.
RESULTS: Of 1697 participants, 265 (15.6%) responded that a physician had made a mistake, 227 (13.4%) reported a wrong diagnosis, 212 (12.5%) reported a wrong treatment, and 239 (14.1%) reported having changed physicians because of a mistake. Participants perceived mistakes and harm in both diagnostic care and medical treatment. Patients with chronic back pain, higher educational attainment, and poor physical health were at increased odds of perceiving mistakes, whereas African American patients were less likely to perceive mistakes.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceived mistakes in their diagnostic and treatment care in the ambulatory setting. These perceptions had a concrete effect on the physician-patient relationship, often leading patients to seek another health care professional.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20837835      PMCID: PMC3070906          DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  36 in total

1.  Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors.

Authors:  Robert J Blendon; Catherine M DesRoches; Mollyann Brodie; John M Benson; Allison B Rosen; Eric Schneider; Drew E Altman; Kinga Zapert; Melissa J Herrmann; Annie E Steffenson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States.

Authors:  R L Phillips; L A Bartholomew; S M Dovey; G E Fryer; T J Miyoshi; L A Green
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

Review 3.  Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Nancy C Elder; Susan M Dovey
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Drug complications in outpatients.

Authors:  T K Gandhi; H R Burstin; E F Cook; A L Puopolo; J S Haas; T A Brennan; D W Bates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado.

Authors:  E J Thomas; D M Studdert; H R Burstin; E J Orav; T Zeena; E J Williams; K M Howard; P C Weiler; T A Brennan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors.

Authors:  Thomas H Gallagher; Amy D Waterman; Alison G Ebers; Victoria J Fraser; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Making the case for a qualitative study of medical errors in primary care.

Authors:  Anton J Kuzel; Steven H Woolf; John D Engel; Valerie J Gilchrist; Richard M Frankel; Thomas A LaVeist; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2003-07

8.  Patient trust in the physician: relationship to patient requests.

Authors:  David H Thom; Richard L Kravitz; Robert A Bell; Edward Krupat; Rahman Azari
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991.

Authors:  T A Brennan; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Hebert; A R Localio; A G Lawthers; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

10.  Health plan members' views about disclosure of medical errors.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Steven R Simon; Robert A Yood; Brian C Martinson; Margaret J Gunter; George W Reed; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  17 in total

1.  Religion benefiting brain tumour patients: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nidhi Ravishankar; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2014-12

2.  Patients' evaluations of patient safety in English general practices: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Kate S Marsden; Anthony J Avery; Brian G Bell; Umesh T Kadam; David Reeves; Sarah P Slight; Katherine Perryman; Jane Barnett; Ian Litchfield; Sally Thomas; Stephen M Campbell; Lucy Doos; Aneez Esmail; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Exploring the feelings of Iranian women of reproductive age about health care seeking behavior: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Morowatisharifabad; Tahereh Rahimi; Tahmineh Farajkhoda; Hossein Fallahzadeh; Siamak Mohebi
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2018-01-07

5.  Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Ragnar Hotvedt; Olav Helge Førde
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Feasibility of patient-reported diagnostic errors following emergency department discharge: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kelly T Gleason; Susan Peterson; Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb; Mariel Villanueva; Taylor Wynn; Paula Bondal; Daniel Berg; Welcome Jerde; David Newman-Toker
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2020-10-05

7.  Which family physician should I choose? The analytic hierarchy process approach for ranking of criteria in the selection of a family physician.

Authors:  Emel Kuruoglu; Dilek Guldal; Vildan Mevsim; Tolga Gunvar
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  The patient is in: patient involvement strategies for diagnostic error mitigation.

Authors:  Kathryn M McDonald; Cindy L Bryce; Mark L Graber
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.

Authors:  Wim Verstappen; Sander Gaal; Aneez Esmail; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 10.  Patients' views of adverse events in primary and ambulatory care: a systematic review to assess methods and the content of what patients consider to be adverse events.

Authors:  Sarah Lang; Marcial Velasco Garrido; Christoph Heintze
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.