Literature DB >> 12477944

Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors.

Robert J Blendon1, Catherine M DesRoches, Mollyann Brodie, John M Benson, Allison B Rosen, Eric Schneider, Drew E Altman, Kinga Zapert, Melissa J Herrmann, Annie E Steffenson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In response to the report by the Institute of Medicine on medical errors, national groups have recommended actions to reduce the occurrence of preventable medical errors. What is not known is the level of support for these proposed changes among practicing physicians and the public.
METHODS: We conducted parallel national surveys of 831 practicing physicians, who responded to mailed questionnaires, and 1207 members of the public, who were interviewed by telephone after selection with the use of random-digit dialing. Respondents were asked about the causes of and solutions to the problem of preventable medical errors and, on the basis of a clinical vignette, were asked what the consequences of an error should be.
RESULTS: Many physicians (35 percent) and members of the public (42 percent) reported errors in their own or a family member's care, but neither group viewed medical errors as one of the most important problems in health care today. A majority of both groups believed that the number of in-hospital deaths due to preventable errors is lower than that reported by the Institute of Medicine. Physicians and the public disagreed on many of the underlying causes of errors and on effective strategies for reducing errors. Neither group believed that moving patients to high-volume centers would be a very effective strategy. The public and many physicians supported the use of sanctions against individual health professionals perceived as responsible for serious errors.
CONCLUSIONS: Though substantial proportions of the public and practicing physicians report that they have had personal experience with medical errors, neither group has the sense of urgency expressed by many national organizations. To advance their agenda, national groups need to convince physicians, in particular, that the current proposals for reducing errors will be very effective. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477944     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa022151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  119 in total

1.  Penetration of medication safety technology in community hospitals.

Authors:  Glen T Schumock; Vinit P Nair; Jamie M Finley; Richard K Lewis
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center.

Authors:  Jos Aarts; Hans Doorewaard; Marc Berg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  'Case reporting of rare adverse events in otolaryngology': can we defend the case report?

Authors:  Andrew Dias; P Casserly; J E Fenton
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Medical Error and Moral Luck.

Authors:  Dieneke Hubbeling
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-09

5.  What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Odelya Pagovich; Daniel Z Sands; Joseph M Li; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; David W Bates; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Volume of activity and occupancy rate in intensive care units. Association with mortality.

Authors:  Gaetano Lapichino; Luciano Gattinoni; Danilo Radrizzani; Bruno Simini; Guido Bertolini; Luca Ferla; Giovanni Mistraletti; Francesca Porta; Dinis R Miranda
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness.

Authors:  A Cleopas; A Villaveces; A Charvet; P A Bovier; V Kolly; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04

8.  Adverse events and near miss reporting in the NHS.

Authors:  R Shaw; F Drever; H Hughes; S Osborn; S Williams
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08

9.  Disclosing medical errors to patients: attitudes and practices of physicians and trainees.

Authors:  Lauris C Kaldjian; Elizabeth W Jones; Barry J Wu; Valerie L Forman-Hoffman; Benjamin H Levi; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  A string of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Anton J Kuzel; Susan M Dovey; Robert L Phillips
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.