Literature DB >> 12597752

Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors.

Thomas H Gallagher1, Amy D Waterman, Alison G Ebers, Victoria J Fraser, Wendy Levinson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite the best efforts of health care practitioners, medical errors are inevitable. Disclosure of errors to patients is desired by patients and recommended by ethicists and professional organizations, but little is known about how patients and physicians think medical errors should be discussed.
OBJECTIVE: To determine patients' and physicians' attitudes about error disclosure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen focus groups were organized, including 6 groups of adult patients, 4 groups of academic and community physicians, and 3 groups of both physicians and patients. A total of 52 patients and 46 physicians participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualitative analysis of focus group transcripts to determine the attitudes of patients and physicians about medical error disclosure; whether physicians disclose the information patients desire; and patients' and physicians' emotional needs when an error occurs and whether these needs are met.
RESULTS: Both patients and physicians had unmet needs following errors. Patients wanted disclosure of all harmful errors and sought information about what happened, why the error happened, how the error's consequences will be mitigated, and how recurrences will be prevented. Physicians agreed that harmful errors should be disclosed but "choose their words carefully" when telling patients about errors. Although physicians disclosed the adverse event, they often avoided stating that an error occurred, why the error happened, or how recurrences would be prevented. Patients also desired emotional support from physicians following errors, including an apology. However, physicians worried that an apology might create legal liability. Physicians were also upset when errors happen but were unsure where to seek emotional support.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians may not be providing the information or emotional support that patients seek following harmful medical errors. Physicians should strive to meet patients' desires for an apology and for information on the nature, cause, and prevention of errors. Institutions should also address the emotional needs of practitioners who are involved in medical errors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12597752     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.8.1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  145 in total

Review 1.  Emerging ethical issues in pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Benedict C Nwomeh; Donna A Caniano
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Radiologist uncertainty and the interpretation of screening.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore; Linn A Abraham; Martha S Gerrity; R Edward Hendrick; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Steven P Poplack; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Medical malpractice reform: the role of alternative dispute resolution.

Authors:  David H Sohn; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Medical error, malpractice and complications: a moral geography.

Authors:  David M Zientek
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-06

5.  Pharmacy student knowledge and communication of medication errors.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Rickles; Carey M Noland; Anthony Tramontozzi; Michele A Vinci
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

7.  Patients' perceptions of safety if interpersonal continuity of care were to be disrupted.

Authors:  Nancy Pandhi; Jessica Schumacher; Kathryn E Flynn; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness.

Authors:  A Cleopas; A Villaveces; A Charvet; P A Bovier; V Kolly; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04

9.  "Prefacing the Script" as an Ethical Response to State-Mandated Abortion Counseling.

Authors:  Mara Buchbinder; Dragana Lassiter; Rebecca Mercier; Amy Bryant; Anne Drapkin Lyerly
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-02-19

10.  Disclosing medical errors to patients: attitudes and practices of physicians and trainees.

Authors:  Lauris C Kaldjian; Elizabeth W Jones; Barry J Wu; Valerie L Forman-Hoffman; Benjamin H Levi; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.