Literature DB >> 10718894

Drug complications in outpatients.

T K Gandhi1, H R Burstin, E F Cook, A L Puopolo, J S Haas, T A Brennan, D W Bates.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Outpatient drug complications have not been well studied. We sought to assess the incidence and characteristics of outpatient drug complications, identify their clinical and nonclinical correlates, and evaluate their impact on patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart reviews and patient surveys.
SETTING: Eleven Boston-area ambulatory clinics. PATIENTS: We randomly selected 2,248 outpatients, 20 to 75 years old.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 2,248 patients reporting prescription drug use, 394 (18%) reported a drug complication. In contrast, chart review revealed an adverse drug event in only 64 patients (3%). In univariate analyses, significant correlates of patient-reported drug complications were number of medical problems, number of medications, renal disease, failure to explain side effects before treatment, lower medication compliance, and primary language other than English or Spanish. In multivariate analysis, independent correlates were number of medical problems (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.05 to 1.30), failure to explain side effects (OR 1.65; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.35), and primary language other than English or Spanish (OR 1.40; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.95). Patient satisfaction was lower among patients who reported drug complications (P <.0001). In addition, 48% of those reporting drug complications sought medical attention and 49% experienced worry or discomfort. On chart review, 3 (5%) of the patients with an adverse drug event required hospitalization and 8 (13%) had a documented previous reaction to the causative drug.
CONCLUSIONS: Drug complications in the ambulatory setting were common, although most were not documented in the medical record. These complications increased use of the medical system and correlated with dissatisfaction with care. Our results indicate a need for better communication about potential side effects of medications, especially for patients with multiple medical problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718894      PMCID: PMC1495358          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.04199.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  19 in total

1.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.

Authors:  L L Leape; T A Brennan; N Laird; A G Lawthers; A R Localio; B A Barnes; L Hebert; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; U Busto; E M Sellers; P Sandor; I Ruiz; E A Roberts; E Janecek; C Domecq; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events.

Authors:  A C O'Neil; L A Petersen; E F Cook; D W Bates; T H Lee; T A Brennan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Self-reported adverse drug reactions and related resource use. A study of community-dwelling persons 65 years of age and older.

Authors:  E A Chrischilles; E T Segar; R B Wallace
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems.

Authors:  D W Bates; A C O'Neil; D Boyle; J Teich; G M Chertow; A L Komaroff; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J P Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care.

Authors:  A R Tarlov; J E Ware; S Greenfield; E C Nelson; E Perrin; M Zubkoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  L L Leape; D W Bates; D J Cullen; J Cooper; H J Demonaco; T Gallivan; R Hallisey; J Ives; N Laird; G Laffel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Frequency, severity and risk factors for adverse drug reactions in adult out-patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  T A Hutchinson; K M Flegel; M S Kramer; D G Leduc; H H Kong
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986
View more
  112 in total

1.  Epidemiology of medical error.

Authors:  S N Weingart; R M Wilson; R W Gibberd; B Harrison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Identifying and reducing complications of outpatient medications.

Authors:  B G Petty
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Epidemiology of medical error

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-06

4.  The best of JGIM.

Authors:  Eric B Bass
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Identifying and Addressing Language Needs in Primary Care: a Pilot Implementation Study.

Authors:  Jessica E Murphy; David Washington; Ziming Xuan; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Mari-Lynn Drainoni
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-12-03

6.  Lack of awareness of community-acquired adverse drug reactions upon hospital admission : dimensions and consequences of a dilemma.

Authors:  Harald Dormann; Manfred Criegee-Rieck; Antje Neubert; Tobias Egger; Arnim Geise; Sabine Krebs; Thomas Schneider; Micha Levy; Eckhart Hahn; Kay Brune
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Field test results of a new ambulatory care Medication Error and Adverse Drug Event Reporting System--MEADERS.

Authors:  John Hickner; Atif Zafar; Grace M Kuo; Lyle J Fagnan; Samuel N Forjuoh; Lyndee M Knox; John T Lynch; Brian Kelly Stevens; Wilson D Pace; Benjamin N Hamlin; Hilary Scherer; Brenda L Hudson; Caitlin Carroll Oppenheimer; William M Tierney
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  David Westfall Bates, MD: a conversation with the editor on improving patient safety, quality of care, and outcomes by using information technology. Interview by William Clifford Roberts.

Authors:  David Westfall Bates
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-04

9.  Effects of limited English proficiency and physician language on health care comprehension.

Authors:  Elisabeth Wilson; Alice H M Chen; Kevin Grumbach; Frances Wang; Alicia Fernandez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Convenient Access to Professional Interpreters in the Hospital Decreases Readmission Rates and Estimated Hospital Expenditures for Patients With Limited English Proficiency.

Authors:  Leah S Karliner; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Steven E Gregorich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.