Literature DB >> 29302783

Does patient age affect the PPV3 of ACR BI-RADS Ultrasound categories 4 and 5 in the diagnostic setting?

Yue Hu1,2, Yaping Yang1,2, Ran Gu1,2, Liang Jin1,2, Shiyu Shen1,2, Fengtao Liu1,2, Hongli Wang1,2, Jingsi Mei1,2, Xiaofang Jiang1,2, Qiang Liu3,4, Fengxi Su5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3) of the Ultrasound section of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS US) atlas categories 4 and 5 in different age groups and to determine whether patient age influences the PPV3 of each category in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
METHODS: We identified 2,433 ACR BI-RADS US categories 4 and 5 lesions with a known pathological diagnosis in 2,433 women. The patients were classified into three age groups (<35, 35-50, and >50 years). The age-related PPV3 of each category in the three age groups were calculated based on the pathological diagnoses and compared using the chi-squared test.
RESULTS: The overall PPV3 of each category was within the reference range provided by the ACR in 2013. PPV3 gradually increased with increasing age in patients with category 4 lesions. PPV3 in the oldest group with subcategories 4A and 4B lesions were close to or exceeded the reference values.
CONCLUSIONS: PPV3 and age were significantly associated in patients with category 4 lesions according to the newest edition of ACR BI-RADS US in the diagnostic setting. Closer attention should be given to older patients when assigning a final assessment category. KEY POINTS: • In patients with category 4 lesions , the likelihood of malignancy is associated with age. • In patients with category 5 lesions, the association is not definite. • Closer attention should be given to older patients in applying the ACR BI-RADS US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age groups; Breast; Diagnosis; Predictive value of tests; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29302783     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5203-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

Review 1.  Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management.

Authors:  Sughra Raza; Allison L Goldkamp; Sona A Chikarmane; Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Can MR Imaging contribute in characterizing well-circumscribed breast carcinomas?

Authors:  Jung Lim Yoo; Ok Hee Woo; Yoon Kyung Kim; Kyu Ran Cho; Hwan Seok Yong; Bo Kyoung Seo; Aeree Kim; Eun-Young Kang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Xuebin Zou; Jianwei Wang; Xiaowen Lan; Qingguang Lin; Feng Han; Longzhong Liu; Anhua Li
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamada; Naoko Mori; Mika Watanabe; Izo Kimijima; Tadayuki Okumoto; Kazumasa Seiji; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Effect of clinical information on diagnostic performance in breast sonography.

Authors:  Song-Ee Baek; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Hye-Jeong Lee; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A history of breast cancer and older age allow risk stratification of mammographic BI-RADS 3 ratings in the diagnostic setting.

Authors:  Matthias Benndorf; Yirong Wu; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 9.  Breast cancer in China.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Kathrin Strasser-Weippl; Jun-Jie Li; Jessica St Louis; Dianne M Finkelstein; Ke-Da Yu; Wan-Qing Chen; Zhi-Ming Shao; Paul E Goss
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western countries?

Authors:  Stanley P L Leong; Zhen-Zhou Shen; Tse-Jia Liu; Gaurav Agarwal; Tomoo Tajima; Nam-Sun Paik; Kerstin Sandelin; Anna Derossis; Hiram Cody; William D Foulkes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  7 in total

1.  Specimen number based diagnostic yields of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in core biopsy in breast cancer: clinical implications from a prospective exploratory study.

Authors:  Yue Hu; Jingsi Mei; Yaping Yang; Ran Gu; Jiajie Zhong; Xiaofang Jiang; Fengtao Liu; Juanjuan Yong; Hongli Wang; Shiyu Shen; Jing Liang; Qiang Liu; Chang Gong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

2.  Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.

Authors:  Seechad Noonpradej; Piyanun Wangkulangkul; Piyanoot Woodtichartpreecha; Suphawat Laohawiriyakamol
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-02-01

3.  Does the radiologist need to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final BI-RADS US assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting?

Authors:  Yue Hu; Jingsi Mei; Xiaofang Jiang; Ran Gu; Fengtao Liu; Yaping Yang; Hongli Wang; Shiyu Shen; Haixia Jia; Qiang Liu; Chang Gong
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Comparison of the Characteristics and Prognosis Between Very Young Women and Older Women With Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Report From China.

Authors:  Yaping Yang; Weidong Wei; Liang Jin; Haiyan He; Mengna Wei; Shiyu Shen; Hao Pi; Zhiqin Liu; Hengyu Li; Jieqiong Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Using Ultrasound-Based Multilayer Perceptron to Differentiate Early Breast Mucinous Cancer and its Subtypes From Fibroadenoma.

Authors:  Ting Liang; Junhui Shen; Shumei Zhang; Shuzhen Cong; Juanjuan Liu; Shufang Pei; Shiyao Shang; Chunwang Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Nomograms for prediction of breast cancer in breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ultrasound category 4 or 5 lesions: A single-center retrospective study based on radiomics features.

Authors:  Zhi-Liang Hong; Sheng Chen; Xiao-Rui Peng; Jian-Wei Li; Jian-Chuan Yang; Song-Song Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  A new nomogram for predicting the malignant diagnosis of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasonography category 4A lesions in women with dense breast tissue in the diagnostic setting.

Authors:  Yaping Yang; Yue Hu; Shiyu Shen; Xiaofang Jiang; Ran Gu; Hongli Wang; Fengtao Liu; Jingsi Mei; Jing Liang; Haixia Jia; Qiang Liu; Chang Gong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.