Literature DB >> 20831510

Dose- and LET-painting with particle therapy.

Niels Bassler1, Oliver Jäkel, Christian Skou Søndergaard, Jørgen B Petersen.   

Abstract

Tumour hypoxia is one of the limiting factors in obtaining tumour control in radiotherapy. The high-LET region of a beam of heavy charged particles such as carbon ions is located in the distal part of the Bragg peak. A modulated or spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) is a weighted function of several Bragg peaks at various energies, which however results in a dilution of the dose-average LET in the target volume. Here, we investigate the possibility to redistribute the LET by dedicated treatment plan optimisation, in order to maximise LET in the target volume. This may be a strategy to potentially overcome hypoxia along with dose escalation or dose painting. The high-LET region can be shaped in very different ways, while maintaining the distribution of the absorbed dose or biological effective dose. Treatment plans involving only carbon ion beams, show very different LET distributions depending on how the fields are arranged. Alternatively, a LET boost can be applied in multi-modal treatment planning, such as combining carbon ions with protons and/or photons. For such mixed radiation modalities, significant "LET boosts" can be achieved at nearly arbitrary positions within the target volume. Following the general understanding of the relationship between hypoxia, LET and the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER), we conclude, that an additional therapeutic advantage can be achieved by confining the high-LET part of the radiation in hypoxic compartments of the tumour, and applying low-LET radiation to the normoxic tissue. We also anticipate that additional advantages may be achieved by deliberate sparing of normal tissue from high LET regions. Consequently, treatment planning based on simultaneous dose and LET optimisation has a potential to achieve higher tumour control and/or reduced normal tissue control probability (NTCP).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20831510     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.510640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  35 in total

1.  Motion mitigation for lung cancer patients treated with active scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Clemens Grassberger; Stephen Dowdell; Greg Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Azin Khabazian; Pablo P Yepes; Gino Lim; Falk Poenisch; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Radiobiological issues in proton therapy.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Christopher R Peeler; Fada Guan; Lawrence Bronk; Wenhua Cao; David R Grosshans
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 4.  Physical advantages of particles: protons and light ions.

Authors:  Oliver Jäkel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Simultaneous optimization of RBE-weighted dose and nanometric ionization distributions in treatment planning with carbon ions.

Authors:  Lucas N Burigo; José Ramos-Méndez; Mark Bangert; Reinhard W Schulte; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Pablo Botas; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Bram L Gorissen; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Physical parameter optimization scheme for radiobiological studies of charged particle therapy.

Authors:  Changran Geng; Drake Gates; Lawrence Bronk; Duo Ma; Fada Guan
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Interplay effects in proton scanning for lung: a 4D Monte Carlo study assessing the impact of tumor and beam delivery parameters.

Authors:  S Dowdell; C Grassberger; G C Sharp; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury.

Authors:  Daphne Haas-Kogan; Daniel Indelicato; Harald Paganetti; Natia Esiashvili; Anita Mahajan; Torunn Yock; Stella Flampouri; Shannon MacDonald; Maryam Fouladi; Kry Stephen; John Kalapurakal; Stephanie Terezakis; Hanne Kooy; David Grosshans; Mike Makrigiorgos; Kavita Mishra; Tina Young Poussaint; Kenneth Cohen; Thomas Fitzgerald; Vinai Gondi; Arthur Liu; Jeff Michalski; Dragan Mirkovic; Radhe Mohan; Stephanie Perkins; Kenneth Wong; Bhadrasain Vikram; Jeff Buchsbaum; Larry Kun
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Optimization of treatment planning for hypoxic tumours and re-modulation of radiation intensity in heavy-ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ladan Rezaee
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.